Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts

We discuss and clarify several aspects of applying Felsenstein's (1985, Am. Nat. 125: 1n15) procedures to test for correlated evolution of continuous traits. This is one of several available comparative methods that maps data for phenotypic traits onto an existing phylogenetic tree (derived from independent information). Application of Felsenstein's method does not require an entirely dichotomous topology. It also does not require an assumption of gradual, clocklike character evolution, as might be modeled by Brownian motion. Almost any available information can be used to estimate branch lengths (e.g., genetic distances, divergence times estimated from the fossil record or from molecular clocks, numbers of character changes from a cladistic analysis). However, the adequacy for statistical purposes of any proposed branch lengths must be verified empirically for each phytogeny and for each character. We suggest a simple way of doing this, based on graphical analysis of plots of standardized independent contrasts versus their standard deviations (i.e., the square roots of the sums of their branch lengths). In some cases, the branch lengths and/or the values of traits being studied will require transformation. An example involving the scaling of mammalian home range area is presented. Once adequately standardized, sets of independent contrasts can be analyzed using either linear or nonlinear (multiple) regression. In all cases, however, regressions (or correlations) must be computed through the origin. We also discuss ways of correcting for body size effects and how this relates to making graphical representations of relationships of standardized independent contrasts. We close with a consideration of the types of traits that can be analyzed with independent contrasts procedures and conclude that any (continuous) trait that is inherited from ancestors is appropriate for analysis, regardless of the mechanism of inheritance (e.g., genetic or cultural).

[1]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[2]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Comparison and adaptation , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  L. Cavalli-Sforza Cultural transmission and evolution , 1981 .

[4]  J. Felsenstein,et al.  How can we infer geography and history from gene frequencies? , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  M. Ridley The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating , 1983 .

[6]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Ahlquist Phylogeny and classification of birds , 1985 .

[8]  J. Cheverud,et al.  THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS IN COMPARATIVE ANALYSES: SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BODY WEIGHT AMONG PRIMATES , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  C. Luke Convergent evolution of lizard toe fringes , 1986 .

[10]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING SYMMORPHOSIS: DOES STRUCTURE MATCH FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS? , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[12]  F. Bookstein Random Walk and the Biometrics of Morphological Characters , 1988 .

[13]  M. Pagel,et al.  The Taxon-Level Problem in the Evolution of Mammalian Brain Size: Facts and Artifacts , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[14]  A. Burt Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1989 .

[15]  M. Pagel,et al.  Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body weight among mammals. , 1989, Science.

[16]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[17]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  Michael LaBarbera,et al.  ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1989 .

[19]  M. Donoghue,et al.  PHYLOGENIES AND THE ANALYSIS OF EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCES, WITH EXAMPLES FROM SEED PLANTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  J. Losos,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF FORM AND FUNCTION: MORPHOLOGY AND LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE IN WEST INDIAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  ACCURACY OF ESTIMATED PHYLOGENIES: EFFECTS OF TREE TOPOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY MODEL , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  W. Maddison A METHOD FOR TESTING THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF TWO BINARY CHARACTERS: ARE GAINS OR LOSSES CONCENTRATED ON CERTAIN BRANCHES OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE? , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[24]  M. Lynch METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  W. Maddison Squared-Change Parsimony Reconstructions of Ancestral States for Continuous-Valued Characters on a Phylogenetic Tree , 1991 .

[26]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Physiological Differentiation of Vertebrate Populations , 1991 .

[27]  Regression Models in Evolutionary Allometry , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Andy Purvis,et al.  Comparative methods for explaining adaptations , 1991, Nature.

[29]  T. Garland,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  L. Leemis Applied Linear Regression Models , 1991 .

[31]  M. Pagel A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[32]  A. Grafen The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regression , 1992 .

[33]  T. Garland Rate Tests for Phenotypic Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[34]  On solving the correct problem: Wishing does not make it so* , 1992 .

[35]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Does metatarsal/femur ratio predict maximal running speed in cursorial mammals? , 1993 .