From cartoons to quantitative models in Golgi transport

Cell biology is evolving to become a more formal and quantitative science. In particular, several mathematical models have been proposed to address Golgi self-organization and protein and lipid transport. However, most scientific articles about the Golgi apparatus are still using static cartoons to represent their findings that miss the dynamism of this organelle. In this report, we show that schematic drawings of Golgi trafficking can be easily translated into an Agent-Based Model (ABM) using the Repast platform. The simulations generate an active interplay among cisternae and vesicles rendering quantitative predictions about Golgi stability and transport of soluble and membrane-associated cargoes. The models can incorporate complex networks of molecular interactions and chemical reactions by association with COPASI, a software that handles Ordinary Differential Equations. The strategy described provides a simple, flexible, and multiscale support to analyze Golgi transport. The simulations can be used to address issues directly linked to the mechanism of transport or as a way to incorporate the complexity of trafficking to other cellular processes that occur in dynamic organelles.

[1]  J. Bonifacino,et al.  The Mechanisms of Vesicle Budding and Fusion , 2004, Cell.

[2]  Yongguo Mei,et al.  ENISI MSM: A novel multi-scale modeling platform for computational immunology , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).

[3]  Thorsten Lang,et al.  Membrane fusion. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[4]  J. Bassaganya-Riera,et al.  Reconstruction of endosomal organization and function by a combination of ODE and agent-based modeling strategies , 2018, Biology Direct.

[5]  Michael J. North,et al.  Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[6]  M. Betenbaugh,et al.  Cellular traffic cops: the interplay between lipids and proteins regulates vesicular formation, trafficking, and signaling in mammalian cells. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  Mudita Singhal,et al.  COPASI - a COmplex PAthway SImulator , 2006, Bioinform..

[8]  M. Rao,et al.  (Re)modeling the Golgi. , 2013, Methods in cell biology.

[9]  P. Sens,et al.  Stochastic Model of Vesicular Sorting in Cellular Organelles. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[10]  L. Mayorga,et al.  Modeling Fusion/Fission‐Dependent Intracellular Transport of Fluid Phase Markers , 2010, Traffic.

[11]  A. Luini,et al.  Models for Golgi traffic: a critical assessment. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[12]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Iterative fractionation of recycling receptors from lysosomally destined ligands in an early sorting endosome , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. Rothman,et al.  The Golgi ribbon structure facilitates anterograde transport of large cargoes , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  Iaroslav Ispolatov,et al.  A Model for the Self-Organization of Vesicular Flux and Protein Distributions in the Golgi Apparatus , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  T. Südhof,et al.  Membrane Fusion: Grappling with SNARE and SM Proteins , 2009, Science.

[16]  M. Zerial,et al.  Mosaic organization of the endocytic pathway. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[17]  S. Kornfeld,et al.  Recycling of Golgi glycosyltransferases requires direct binding to coatomer , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Alberto Luini,et al.  Mendelian disorders of membrane trafficking. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Luini,et al.  Transport of soluble proteins through the Golgi occurs by diffusion via continuities across cisternae , 2014, eLife.

[20]  I. Cebrian,et al.  Differential requirement of Rab22a for the recruitment of ER-derived proteins to phagosomes and endosomes in dendritic cells , 2017, Small GTPases.

[21]  Russell Schwartz,et al.  Discrete, continuous, and stochastic models of protein sorting in the Golgi apparatus. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Shankar Mukherji,et al.  Mechanisms of organelle biogenesis govern stochastic fluctuations in organelle abundance , 2014, eLife.

[23]  R. Jahn,et al.  Molecular machines governing exocytosis of synaptic vesicles , 2012, Nature.

[24]  Kyoungtae Kim Cargo trafficking from the trans‐Golgi network towards the endosome , 2016, Biology of the cell.

[25]  P. Sens,et al.  Stochastic Model of Maturation and Vesicular Exchange in Cellular Organelles. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[26]  M. Thattai,et al.  Stacking the odds for Golgi cisternal maturation , 2016, eLife.

[27]  L. Johannes,et al.  Increasing Diversity of Biological Membrane Fission Mechanisms. , 2018, Trends in cell biology.

[28]  A. Luini,et al.  Golgi and TGN , 2016 .

[29]  W. Sundquist,et al.  Membrane fission reactions of the mammalian ESCRT pathway. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  M. Rao,et al.  Nonequilibrium description of de novo biogenesis and transport through Golgi-like cisternae , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[31]  M. Rao,et al.  Quantitative analysis of intra-Golgi transport shows intercisternal exchange for all cargo , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  A. Goede,et al.  A Conceptual Mathematical Model of the Dynamic Self-Organisation of Distinct Cellular Organelles , 2009, PloS one.

[33]  A. Nakano,et al.  Visualization of secretory cargo transport within the Golgi apparatus , 2019, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Helmut Grubmüller,et al.  Molecular Anatomy of a Trafficking Organelle , 2006, Cell.