LEVEL SPECIFICATION: USING TRIANGULATION IN A GROUNDED THEORY APPROACH TO CONSTRUCT VALIDATION

We argue in this chapter that quantitative techniques alone cannot enable appropriate verification of the levels in which a construct should be defined and validated. We propose a process model that takes advantage of qualitative and quantitative methods when specifying and measuring the level(s) of analysis in construct development. The model implies that operationalizing a construct and its measurement should involve both qualitative and quantitative methods. Level specification begins with induction of constructs and continues with qualitative or quantitative operationalizations that are verified through the convergence of using triangulation and aggregation tests. Construct development continues until the level of analysis is accurately specified. We provide a theoretical example of construct development from the leadership literature and an empirical example to represent the verification process.

[1]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[2]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[3]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  John,et al.  Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research: A Preface. , 1979 .

[5]  B. Skinner.  Beyond Freedom and Dignity , 1972 .

[6]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[7]  John J. Sosik,et al.  EFFECTS OF LEADERSHIP STYLE AND PROBLEM STRUCTURE ON WORK GROUP PROCESS AND OUTCOMES IN AN ELECTRONIC MEETING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT , 1997 .

[8]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[9]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Comment: Organizations Do Not Cognize , 1988 .

[10]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[11]  John Van Maanen,et al.  Police organization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. , 1975 .

[12]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[13]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[14]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences , 1966 .

[15]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  Hypothesized Interdependence, Assumed Independence , 1984 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[17]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[18]  B. Glaser.  Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[19]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Investigating contingencies: an examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Henry Mintzberg.  An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research , 1979 .

[21]  D. Rousseau.  Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[22]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[23]  S. Kahai,et al.  E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice , 2000 .

[24]  B. Bass,et al.  Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. , 1995 .

[25]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. , 1966 .

[26]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Theory testing in organizational behavior : the varient approach , 1987 .

[27]  William H. Glick,et al.  Response: Organizations Are Not Central Tendencies: Shadowboxing in the Dark, Round 2 , 1988 .

[28]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  Cross-Level Inference and Organizational Research: Perspectives on Interpretation and Application , 1983 .

[29]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. , 1994 .