A new noninvasive measurement system for wave intensity: evaluation of carotid arterial wave intensity and reproducibility

Abstract. Wave intensity (WI) is a new hemodynamic index that provides information about the dynamic behavior of the heart and the vascular system and their interaction. Carotid arterial wave intensity in normal subjects has two positive peaks. The first peak, W1, occurs during early systole, the magnitude of which increases with increases in cardiac contractility. The second peak, W2, which occurs towards the end of ejection, is related to the ability of the left ventricle to actively stop aortic blood flow. Between the two positive peaks, a negative area, NA, is often observed, which signifies reflections from the cerebral circulation. The time interval between the R-wave of ECG and the first peak (R − W1) corresponds to the pre-ejection period, and that between the first and second peaks (W1 − W2) corresponds to ejection time. We developed a new ultrasonic on-line system for obtaining WI and arterial stiffness (β). The purpose of this study was (1) to report normal values of various indices derived from WI and β measured with this system, and (2) to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the measurements. The measurement system is composed of a computer, a WI unit, and an ultrasonic machine. The WI unit gives the instantaneous change in diameter of the artery and the instantaneous mean blood velocity through the sampling gate. Using these parameters and blood pressure measured with a cuff-type manometer, the computer gives WI and β. We applied this method to the carotid artery in 135 normal subjects. The mean values of W1, W2, NA, R − W1, and W1 − W2 were 8 940 ± 3 790 mmHg m/s3, 1 840 ± 880 mmHg m/s3, 27 ± 13 mmHg m/s2, 104 ± 14 ms, and 270 ± 19 ms, respectively. These values did not show a significant correlation with age. The mean value of β was 10.4 ± 4.8 and the values significantly correlated with age (men: r = 0.66, P < 0.0001; women: r = 0.81, P < 0.0001). The reproducibility was evaluated by intraobserver intrasession (IA), intraobserver intersession (IE), and interobserver intrasession variability (IO). The reproducibility of R − W1 and W1 − W2 was high: the mean coefficient of variation (mCV) of IA was less than 3%; 95% confidence limits from the mean values (CL) were less than 8% for IE and less than 4% for IO. The reproducibility of W1 and β was good: mCV for IA was less than 10%; CL for IE and IO were less than 17%. W2 and NA showed a higher variability than other indices: mCV for IA was less than 13%, and CL for IE and IO were less than 36%. However, two sessions by the same observer and two sessions by different observers were not biased. Wave intensity measurements with this system are clinically acceptable.

[1]  M. Sugawara,et al.  Development of a non-invasive real-time measurement system of wave intensity , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[2]  Motoaki Sugawara,et al.  Compression and expansion wavefront travel in canine ascending aortic flow: wave intensity analysis , 2002, Heart and Vessels.

[3]  Kiyomi Niki,et al.  Relationship between the pressure and diameter of the carotid artery in humans , 2000, Heart and Vessels.

[4]  J. Steinier,et al.  Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least square procedure. , 1972, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[6]  H Handa,et al.  Mechanical properties of human cerebral arteries. , 1980, Biorheology.

[7]  M Sugawara,et al.  Arterial wave intensity and ventriculoarterial interaction. , 1997, Heart and vessels.

[8]  K. Parker,et al.  Forward and backward running waves in the arteries: analysis using the method of characteristics. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  Hirofumi Tanaka,et al.  Aging, Habitual Exercise, and Dynamic Arterial Compliance , 2000, Circulation.

[11]  B. Sonesson,et al.  Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery--variations with age and sex. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  S Sasayama,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries. , 1987, Cardiovascular research.

[13]  J. Greenfield,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF RADIUS TO PRESSURE ALONG THE AORTA IN LIVING DOGS. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  S. Sasayama,et al.  Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. , 1989, Circulation.

[15]  A. J. Mallos,et al.  Relationship of aortic pressure and diameter in the dog. , 1961, Journal of applied physiology.