Norm autonomous agents

Since the beginning of multiagent systems research, it has been argued that theories from the realm of the social sciences can be of help when building multiagent systems, and to some extent vice versa. This study sketches the concepts necessary for agents based on social theories. The concepts, viz. agent, autonomy and norms, used in these theories are discussed and defined. The social theories include theories on decision making, various rationality and action models, and the role and modeling of other agents. The sociological debate on the micro-macro problem is analyzed and translated to multiagent research and combined with philosophical theories on sociality. An agent typology is proposed and linked to the communication and modeling possibilities of the agents. Concluding the thesis is a selection of articles presented at workshops and conferences, focusing on the usefulness of norms for artificial adjustable autonomous agents, and two articles on simulation studies in order to develop and test organization theories.

[1]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  On the Emergence of Social Conventions: Modeling, Analysis, and Simulations , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Peter Stone,et al.  Layered Learning in Multiagent Systems , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[3]  Paul Davidsson,et al.  Autonomous Agents and the Concept of Concepts , 1996 .

[4]  Margaret Gilbert SOCIALITY AS A PHILOSOPHICALLY SIGNIFICANT CATEGORY , 1994 .

[5]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[6]  E. Ullmann-Margalit The Emergence Of Norms , 1977 .

[7]  Kathleen M. Carley A comparison of artificial and human organizations , 1996 .

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[9]  R. Conte,et al.  Cognitive and social action , 1995 .

[10]  R. L. Goodstein,et al.  An Essay in Modal Logic , 1953, The Mathematical Gazette.

[11]  Harko Verhagen,et al.  TASCCS: a synthesis of double-AISS and plural-soar , 1994 .

[12]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  A cognitive approach to values , 1989 .

[13]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  A different approach to deontic logic: deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic , 1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  The Proverbs of Administration , 1946 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The nature of the social agent , 1994 .

[16]  G. P. Henderson,et al.  An Essay in Modal Logic. , 1953 .

[17]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Deals Among Rational Agents , 1985, IJCAI.

[18]  Harvey Pinney The Structure of Social Action , 1940, Ethics.

[19]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy for Human-Centered Autonomous Systems on Mars , 1998 .

[20]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents , 1995, CACM.

[21]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[22]  Luc Steels,et al.  Cooperation between distributed agents through self-organisation , 1990, EEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Towards a New Frontier of Applications.

[23]  M. Schäfers,et al.  Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft , 1988 .

[24]  Magnus Boman,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy, Norms and Pronouncers † , 1999 .

[25]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: Freedom of the will and the concept of a person , 1971 .

[26]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Computational Organization Theory , 2000 .

[27]  Harko Verhagen,et al.  Ajustable Autonomy Delegation and Distribution of Decision Making , 1999, CEEMAS.

[28]  Margaret Gilbert On Social Facts , 1989 .

[29]  James S. Coleman,et al.  Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique , 1992 .

[30]  Eric Werner,et al.  Logical foundations of distributed artificial intelligence , 1996 .

[31]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[32]  David-Hillel Ruben,et al.  Having Reasons: An Essay on Rationality and Sociality , 1985 .

[33]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents , 1996, ATAL.

[34]  Rune Gustavsson Multi Agent Systems as Open Societies - A Design Framework , 1997, ATAL.

[35]  Luciano Serafini,et al.  Multi-Agent Reasoning with Belief Contexts: The Approach and a Case Study , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[36]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[37]  Ruth Aylett,et al.  What Does a Planner Need to Know About Execution? , 1997, ECP.

[38]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents , 1997, IEE Proc. Softw. Eng..

[39]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Beyond The Knowledge Level , 1986, Expert Database Conf..

[40]  Love Ekenberg,et al.  General risk constraints , 2001 .

[41]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .

[42]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[43]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[44]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[45]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Socially Responsible Decision Making by Autonomous Agents , 1999 .

[46]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Multiagent Collaboration in Directed Improvisation , 1997, ICMAS.

[47]  Dragan Milovanovic,et al.  Book Review: Review of the Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[48]  George B. Kleindorfer,et al.  The Theory of Bounded Rationality and The Problem of Legitimation , 1987 .

[49]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[50]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Modelling Communication between Cooperative Systems , 1995, CAiSE.

[51]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Meeting the Deadline: On the Formal Specification of Temporal Deontic Constraints , 1996, ISMIS.

[52]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[53]  A. H. Bond,et al.  An Analysis of Problems and Research in DAI , 1988 .

[54]  Mark S. Boddy,et al.  An Analysis of Time-Dependent Planning , 1988, AAAI.

[55]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Personality-Driven Social Behaviors in Believable Agents , 1997 .

[56]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Software agents , 1994, CACM.

[57]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[58]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  ACTS theory: extending the model of bounded rationality , 1994 .

[59]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  RoboCup: The Robot World Cup Initiative , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[60]  M. Masuch,et al.  Beyond Garbage Cans: An AI Model of Organizational Choice , 1989 .

[61]  J. Greenberg Behavior in organizations : understanding and managing the human side of work / Jerlad Greenberg and Robert A. Baron , 2000 .

[62]  Andreas Harrer,et al.  Simulating Norms, Social Inequality, and Functional Change in Artificial Societies , 1999, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[63]  T. Parsons,et al.  The Structure of Social Action , 1938 .

[64]  K. Suzanne Barber,et al.  Dynamic adaptive autonomy in multi-agent systems , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[65]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Autonomous Norm Acceptance , 1998, ATAL.

[66]  N. Jennings On Being Responsible , 1992 .

[67]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Modeling Social Action for AI Agents , 1997, IJCAI.

[68]  Amol Dattatraya Mali Social Laws For Agent Modeling , 1996, Agent Modeling.

[69]  Kathleen M. Carley Artificial Intelligence within Sociology , 1996 .

[70]  C. Moore,et al.  Intentional relations and social understanding , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[71]  Edna Ullmann-Margalit,et al.  The Emergence Of Norms , 1977 .

[72]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[73]  Barry Hindess,et al.  Choice, Rationality and Social Theory , 1990 .

[74]  James Odell,et al.  Engineering Artifacts for Multi-Agent Systems , 1999 .

[75]  Margaret Gilbert,et al.  Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation , 1996 .

[76]  Håkan L. S. Younes,et al.  Artificial Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Intelligent Buildings , 1999, UAI.

[77]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  On the Synthesis of Useful Social Laws for Artificial Agent Societies (Preliminary Report) , 1992, AAAI.

[78]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[79]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  Distributed Problem Solving and Multi-Agent Systems: Comparisons and Examples* , 1994 .

[80]  David J. Israel,et al.  Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[81]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[82]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[83]  Magnus Boman,et al.  Social Intelligence as Norm Adaptation , 1998 .

[84]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[85]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work , 1984 .

[86]  Sascha Ossowski,et al.  Co-ordination in Artificial Agent Societies , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[87]  John F. Padgett Managing Garbage Can Hierarchies , 1980 .

[88]  Les Gasser,et al.  Social Conceptions of Knowledge and Action: DAI Foundations and Open Systems Semantics , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[89]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[90]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[91]  Ivan Leudar,et al.  Sociogenesis, Coordination and Mutualism , 1991 .

[92]  K. Marx Das Kapital : Kritik der politischen Ökonomie , 1922 .

[93]  R. Tuomela The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions , 1995 .

[94]  E. Durfee,et al.  The Impact of Nested Agent Models in an Information Economy , 1996 .

[95]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  Flexible Social Laws , 1995, IJCAI.