Technology in S&C: Assessing Bodyweight Squat Technique with Wearable Sensors.

Abstract O'Reilly, MA, Whelan, DF, Ward, TE, Delahunt, E, and Caulfield, BM. Technology in strength and conditioning: assessing bodyweight squat technique with wearable sensors. J Strength Cond Res 31(8): 2303–2312, 2017—Strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches offer expert guidance to help those they work with achieve their personal fitness goals. However, it is not always practical to operate under the direct supervision of an S&C coach and consequently individuals are often left training without expert oversight. Recent developments in inertial measurement units (IMUs) and mobile computing platforms have allowed for the possibility of unobtrusive motion tracking systems and the provision of real-time individualized feedback regarding exercise performance. These systems could enable S&C coaches to remotely monitor sessions and help individuals record their workout performance. One aspect of such technologies is the ability to assess exercise technique and detect common deviations from acceptable exercise form. In this study, we investigate this ability in the context of a bodyweight (BW) squat exercise. Inertial measurement units were positioned on the lumbar spine, thighs, and shanks of 77 healthy participants. Participants completed repetitions of BW squats with acceptable form and 5 common deviations from acceptable BW squatting technique. Descriptive features were extracted from the IMU signals for each BW squat repetition, and these were used to train a technique classifier. Acceptable or aberrant BW squat technique can be detected with 98% accuracy, 96% sensitivity, and 99% specificity when using features derived from all 5 IMUs. A single IMU system can also distinguish between acceptable and aberrant BW squat biomechanics with excellent accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Detecting exact deviations from acceptable BW squatting technique can be achieved with 80% accuracy using a 5 IMU system and 72% accuracy when using a single IMU positioned on the right shank. These results suggest that IMU-based systems can distinguish between acceptable and aberrant BW squat technique with excellent accuracy with a single IMU system. Identification of exact deviations is also possible but multi-IMU systems outperform single IMU systems.

[1]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  E. B. George,et al.  Fractals and the analysis of growth paths , 1985, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  A. Geurts,et al.  Definition dependent properties of the cortical silent period in upper-extremity muscles, a methodological study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  B Bonnechère,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities: comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[5]  Dennis Brandborg Nielsen,et al.  Forward lunge knee biomechanics before and after partial meniscectomy. , 2015, The Knee.

[6]  Vincent Bonnet,et al.  Real-time Estimate of Body Kinematics During a Planar Squat Task Using a Single Inertial Measurement Unit , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Validation of the angular measurements of a new inertial-measurement-unit based rehabilitation system: comparison with state-of-the-art gait analysis , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  C. Mazzà,et al.  A least-squares identification algorithm for estimating squat exercise mechanics using a single inertial measurement unit. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Peter Kokol,et al.  Exercise repetition detection for resistance training based on smartphones , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[10]  Tadayoshi Fushiki,et al.  Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation , 2011, Stat. Comput..

[11]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Gyroscope-based assessment of temporal gait parameters during treadmill walking and running , 2012 .

[12]  Toshiyo Tamura,et al.  Measurement and Estimation of 3D Orientation using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors , 2015 .

[13]  David Whiteside,et al.  Grading the Functional Movement Screen: A Comparison of Manual (Real-Time) and Objective Methods , 2016, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[15]  A. J. Jerri The Shannon sampling theorem—Its various extensions and applications: A tutorial review , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Recognizing the intensity of strength training exercises with wearable sensors , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.