Training Authors of Informative Documents

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the methods of training authors of informative documents who write material of practical value to the real world; the authors considered in the chapter are white-collar authors. Any sensible discussion about training authors requires first that one establishes who the authors to be trained are. The white-collar writers are well educated. They hold jobs that require college degrees, and many hold advanced or professional degrees. Most write a lot in their jobs, far more than they ever imagined that they would. Almost all are articulate speakers of English. Most are not trained as writers and they do not primarily identify themselves as writers. Working writers do different kinds of writing. Some compose original writing. Others revise existing written text. Still others edit. Many do all three. Whatever they write, and wherever they work, the written products they finally generate have practical uses. Whether one calls these written products informative documents, functional text, public documents, or some other name, they are written to inform a particular audience about something and to help the reader decide whether and how to act.

[1]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Testing a Readable Writing Approach to Text Revision. , 1982 .

[2]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Decisions and Revisions: The Planning Strategies of a Publishing Writer. , 1983 .

[3]  John Seely Brown,et al.  SYSTEMATIC UNDERSTANDING: Synthesis, Analysis, and Contingent Knowledge in Specialized Understanding Systems , 1975 .

[4]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[5]  D Burns,et al.  Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Donald M. Murray,et al.  Response of a Laboratory Rat--Or, Being Protocoled. , 1983 .

[7]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[8]  Peter Coles,et al.  An Experimental Study of Typographic Cueing in Printed Text , 1977 .

[9]  Lisa Ede,et al.  Why write . . . together , 1983 .

[10]  D. Hakes,et al.  Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns , 1970 .

[11]  James H. Crouse,et al.  Effects of Encoding Cues on Prose Learning. , 1972 .

[12]  Pearl G. Aldrich Adult Writers: Some Factors That Interfere with Effective Writing. , 1982 .

[13]  J. Hayes,et al.  The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem. , 1980 .

[14]  Maxine Hairston,et al.  Not All Errors are Created Equal - Nonacademic Readers in the Professions Respond to Lapses in Usage , 1981 .

[15]  Ivor K. Davies,et al.  Preinstructional Strategies: The Role of Pretests, Behavioral Objectives, Overviews and Advance Organizers , 1976 .

[16]  Veda R. Charrow,et al.  Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions , 1979 .

[17]  P. Wright,et al.  Written information: Some alternatives to prose for expressing the outcomes of complex contingencies. , 1973 .

[18]  Covert Language Behavior during Writing. , 1983 .

[19]  Lester Faigley,et al.  What We Learn from Writing on the Job , 1982 .

[20]  George A. Miller,et al.  Free Recall of Self-Embedded English Sentences , 1964, Inf. Control..

[21]  The Teaching of Writing and the Knowledge Gap. , 1983 .

[22]  Dixie Goswami,et al.  Writing in a Non-Academic Setting. , 1982 .

[23]  James Hartley,et al.  Eighty ways of improving instructional text , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[24]  Jack Selzer,et al.  The Composing Processes of an Engineer. , 1983 .

[25]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Understanding a Writer’s Awareness of Audience , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[26]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Summarizing Stories After Reading and Listening. , 1977 .

[27]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Control of Prose Processing via Instructional and Typographical Cues. , 1979 .