Use of noise cancellation earphones in out-of-booth audiometric evaluations

Abstract Objective: To assess the utility of noise cancelation earphones (NCE) in audiometric evaluations. Design: Degree of noise reduction of Bose QuietComfort 15 NCE was assessed through probe-microphone measures and sound-field audiometry. Occlusion effects from NCE were assessed for potential effects on bone-conduction thresholds. Study sample: Twenty participants were tested to determine average occlusion effect values during bone-conduction testing with and without NCE. Noise reduction values of the NCE were assessed on a single subject through probe-microphone measures and sound-field testing. Results: NCE sufficiently reduced ambient noise to levels acceptable for air-conduction testing as well as for bone-conduction testing for most patients when adding minimal adjustment to acceptable levels as outlined by the ANSI S3.1-1999 standard. In addition, NCE did not create a clinically significant change in the occlusion effect for bone-conduction testing. Conclusion: NCE placed over insert earphones provide a sound pressure level at the tympanic membrane that is below ANSI standards for routine air-conduction testing and result in sufficient ambient noise reduction for bone-conduction testing with most patients. There is no clinically significant occlusion effect from NCE during routine bone-conduction audiometry. These findings support the utility of using NCE for offsite audiometric testing.

[1]  R. Klich,et al.  Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school. , 2008, American journal of audiology.

[2]  V. Parsa,et al.  Active Noise Reduction Audiometry: A Prospective Analysis of a New Approach to Noise Management in Audiometric Testing , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  De Wet Swanepoel,et al.  Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[4]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  A model of the occlusion effect with bone-conducted stimulation , 2007, International journal of audiology.

[5]  F N Martin,et al.  Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  R. Naunton,et al.  The Stability of the Occlusion Effect , 1963 .

[7]  J D Durrant,et al.  Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. , 1993, American journal of audiology.

[8]  G. Studebaker,et al.  Placement of vibrator in bone-conduction testing. , 1962, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  Robert H Margolis,et al.  The Acoustic Test Environment for Hearing Testing. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  R. Patuzzi,et al.  Audiology education and practice from an international perspective , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[11]  Bradley McPherson,et al.  Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones , 2013, BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders.