Optimal product family design with platform modularity and component sharing under uncertain environment

The customer demands of various products bring a challenge for manufacturers. They have to design customized products while maintaining economies of scale and low costs. In this paper, to address this challenge, four approaches are argued to help companies find out the optimal solutions of products’ performance and the maximum profit: (i) only platform modularity without component sharing (ii) only component sharing without platform modularity, (iii) using both platform modularity and component sharing to develop products, or iv) the products are developed individually from a given unshared components set. A theoretical model is proposed and the most profitable approach is found to develop a whole new product family when uncertainty exists in the customer demand and economies of scale with pre-defined parameters. We find that, when consumers’ valuation is considered, the manufacturer may prefer to adopt platform or component sharing individually rather than combining them because the performance of high-end products using platform and component sharing strategies is worse than that using two strategies separately. If platform and component sharing are adopted, the high-end product is under designed, but the manufacturer can benefit from economies of scale. When economies of scale of the platform are greater than or equal to that of component sharing, the optimal performance level of low-end products under platform strategy is lower than that under component sharing strategy. Finally, the detailed numerical analysis provides support for the feasibility and effectiveness of the model.

[1]  Dan A. Ralescu,et al.  Product configuration using redundancy and standardisation in an uncertain environment , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[2]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Integrating customer requirements into customized product configuration design based on Kano’s model , 2020, J. Intell. Manuf..

[3]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[4]  Kentaro Nobeoka,et al.  Multi-Project Strategy and Market-Share Growth: The Benefits of Rapid Design Transfer in New Product Development , 2018 .

[5]  Hyoduk Shin,et al.  Business Models for Technology-Intensive Supply Chains , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Baoding Liu,et al.  Uncertain Multiobjective Programming and Uncertain Goal Programming , 2015 .

[7]  Juanjuan Wu,et al.  Personalizing 3D virtual fashion stores: Exploring modularity with a typology of atmospherics based on user input , 2021, Inf. Manag..

[8]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[9]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Remanufacturing and the component commonality decision , 2013 .

[10]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Mass Customization at Hewlett-Packard : The Power of Postponement , 1999 .

[11]  Pervaiz Akhtar,et al.  Towards customization: Evaluation of integrated sales, product, and production configuration , 2020 .

[12]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-Based Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[14]  Dan A. Ralescu,et al.  The impact of lead-time uncertainty in product configuration , 2020 .

[15]  Stanley M. Davis,et al.  From “future perfect”: Mass customizing , 1989 .

[16]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Assessing Customer Evaluation and Revenue Consequences of Component Sharing Across Brands in the Vertical Product Line , 2005 .

[17]  James D. Dana,et al.  Remark on "Appropriateness and Impact of Platform - Based Product Development" , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Bruce G. Cameron,et al.  Commonality opportunity search in industrial product portfolios , 2019 .

[19]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  A weighted set cover problem for product family design to maximize the commonality of products , 2019 .

[20]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Integrated production planning and quality control for linear production systems under uncertainties of cycle time and finished product quality , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[21]  Dong Yang,et al.  Decision support to product configuration considering component replenishment uncertainty: A stochastic programming approach , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[23]  Dong Yang,et al.  A Stackelberg game theoretic model for optimizing product family architecting with supply chain consideration , 2016 .

[24]  Yaodong Ni,et al.  Optimal platform design with modularity strategy under fuzzy environment , 2019, Soft Comput..

[25]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  A hybrid model of component sharing and platform modularity for optimal product family design , 2013 .

[26]  Y. Qi,et al.  Manufacturing practices and servitization: The role of mass customization and product innovation capabilities , 2020 .

[27]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  When can we safely reuse systems, upgrade systems, or use COTS components? , 2000 .

[28]  Monica Menendez,et al.  On the design of an optimal flexible bus dispatching system with modular bus units: Using the three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram , 2021 .