Realizing ecosystem services: wetland hydrologic function along a gradient of ecosystem condition.

Wetlands provide numerous ecosystem services, from habitat provision to pollutant removal, floodwater storage, and microclimate regulation. Delivery of particular services relies on specific ecological functions, and thus to varying degree on wetland ecological condition, commonly quantified as departure from minimally impacted reference sites. Condition assessments are widely adopted as regulatory indicators of ecosystem function, and for some services (e.g., habitat) links between condition and function are often direct. For others, however, links are more tenuous, and using condition alone to enumerate ecosystem value (e.g., for compensatory mitigation) may underestimate important services. Hydrologic function affects many services cited in support of wetland protection both directly (floodwater retention, microclimate regulation) and indirectly (biogeochemical cycling, pollutant removal). We investigated links between condition and hydrologic function to test the hypothesis, embedded in regulatory assessment of wetland value, that condition predicts function. Condition was assessed using rapid and intensive approaches, including Florida's official wetland assessment tool, in 11 isolated forested wetlands in north Florida (USA) spanning a land use intensity gradient. Hydrologic function was assessed using hydrologic regime (mean, variance, and rates of change of water depth), and measurements of groundwater exchange and evapotranspiration (ET). Despite a wide range in condition, no systematic variation in hydrologic regime was observed; indeed reference sites spanned the full range of variation. In contrast, ET was affected by land use, with higher rates in intensive (agriculture and urban) landscapes in response to higher leaf area. ET determines latent heat exchange, which regulates microclimate, a valuable service in urban heat islands. Higher ET also indicates higher productivity and thus carbon cycling. Groundwater exchange regularly reversed flow direction at all sites in response to rainfall. This buffering effect on regional aquifer levels, an underappreciated service of isolated wetlands, was provided regardless of condition. Intensive landscapes may benefit most from the hydrologic services that wetlands provide because that is where certain services (floodwater storage, microclimate regulation) are realized. While the portfolio of wetland services clearly changes with disturbance, our results support a revised approach to wetland valuation that recognizes the services that accrue from sustained or enhanced functions in these "working wetlands."

[1]  Rachel Spronken-Smith,et al.  Advection and the surface energy balance across an irrigated urban park , 2000 .

[2]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature , 1985 .

[3]  J. Ehrenfeld.  The expression of multiple functions in urban forested wetlands , 2004, Wetlands.

[4]  R. Lopez,et al.  TESTING THE FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT INDEX AS AN INDICATOR OF WETLAND CONDITION , 2002 .

[5]  Fabien Quétier,et al.  Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions , 2011 .

[6]  K. Reiss.  Florida Wetland Condition Index for depressional forested wetlands , 2006 .

[7]  Thomas L. Crisman,et al.  The role of water-level fluctuations in shallow lake ecosystems – workshop conclusions , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[8]  Joseph P. McFadden,et al.  Seasonal contributions of vegetation types to suburban evapotranspiration , 2011 .

[9]  H. Taha.  Urban climates and heat islands: albedo, evapotranspiration, and anthropogenic heat , 1997 .

[10]  K. Ewel.  Multiple demands on wetlands. , 1990 .

[11]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[12]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Hydrologic description of forested wetlands in northeastern New Jersey, USA—An urban/suburban region , 2003, Wetlands.

[13]  W. Oechel,et al.  Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation , 2002 .

[14]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[15]  R. Brooks,et al.  Patterns of wetland hydrology in the Ridge and Valley province, Pennsylvania, USA , 2000, Wetlands.

[16]  Richard L. Snyder,et al.  A review of models and micrometeorological methods used to estimate wetland evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[17]  Mark M. Brinson,et al.  The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation , 1996 .

[18]  D. Weller,et al.  Comparing functional assessments of wetlands to measurements of soil characteristics and nitrogen processing , 2007, Wetlands.

[19]  R. Tiner,et al.  Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States , 2003, Wetlands.

[20]  Evaluating wetlands within an urban context , 2000 .

[21]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  A conceptual framework for assessing cumulative impacts on the hydrology of nontidal wetlands , 1988 .

[22]  M. Siobhan Fennessy,et al.  An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands , 2007, Wetlands.

[23]  Mark Ross,et al.  Extinction Depth and Evapotranspiration from Ground Water under Selected Land Covers , 2007, Ground water.

[24]  M. Sophocleous.  Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[25]  James R. Karr,et al.  Biological monitoring: Essential foundation for ecological risk assessment , 1997 .

[26]  James J. Butler,et al.  Estimation of groundwater consumption by phreatophytes using diurnal water table fluctuations: A saturated‐unsaturated flow assessment , 2005 .

[27]  R. Brooks,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Assessments of Mitigation Sites Compared to Natural Reference Wetlands in Pennsylvania , 2012, Wetlands.

[28]  John J. Mack,et al.  Developing a wetland IBI with statewide application after multiple testing iterations , 2007 .

[29]  James Regetz,et al.  Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? , 2008, Ecology letters.

[30]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Microbial reductive dehalogenation. , 1992, Microbiological reviews.

[31]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems , 1999 .

[32]  C. Findlay,et al.  Estimating the ‘critical’ distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  P. Cook,et al.  Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge , 2002 .

[34]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Urban Wetlands: Do Hydrogeomorphic Classification and Reference Criteria Work? , 2009, Environmental management.

[35]  F. Hauer,et al.  The hydrogeomorphic approach to functional assessment of riparian wetlands: evaluating impacts and mitigation on river floodplains in the U.S.A. , 1998 .

[36]  Charles Andrew Cole.  HGM and wetland functional assessment: Six degrees of separation from the data? , 2006 .

[37]  Emilie K. Stander,et al.  Rapid assessment of urban wetlands: Functional assessment model development and evaluation , 2009, Wetlands.

[38]  Thomas Hruby,et al.  Assessments of Wetland Functions: What They Are and What They Are Not , 1999, Environmental management.

[39]  M. Cohen,et al.  Ecosystem specific yield for estimating evapotranspiration and groundwater exchange from diel surface water variation , 2014 .

[40]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Denitrification potential and organic matter as affected by vegetation community, wetland age, and plant introduction in created wetlands. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[41]  H. Riekerk,et al.  The hydrology of cypress wetlands in Florida pine flatwoods , 2000, Wetlands.

[42]  G. Daily,et al.  The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services , 2007 .