Dynamic and subjective responses of seated subjects exposed to simultaneous vertical and fore-and-aft whole-body vibration: The effect of the phase between the two single-axis components

Abstract Subjective and dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to simultaneous vertical and fore-and-aft sinusoidal whole-body vibration were investigated. The effect of the phase difference between the vertical and the fore-and-aft vibration on the responses was of a particular interest in this study. Fifteen subjects were exposed to dual-axis vibrations at six frequencies (2.5–8 Hz) and at eight phases between the two single-axis components (0–315°). The magnitude of vibration in each axis was constant at 0.7 m s −2 rms. Discomfort caused by vibration was measured by the method of magnitude estimation. The motion of the body were measured at the head and three locations along the spine with accelerometers attached to the body surface. The most significant effect of the phase between the two single-axis components on the discomfort was observed at 5 Hz: about 40% difference in the median discomfort estimate caused by changing the phase. The transmissibilities from vertical seat vibration to vertical motions of the spine varied from 0.5 to 2.0 by changing the phase between the two single-axis components at frequencies from 2.5 to 5 Hz. The effect of the phase observed in the dynamic response was not predicted by the superposition of the responses to each single-axis vibration. The discomfort caused by the dual-axis vibration tended to be correlated better with the combinations of the dynamic responses measured in the two axes than with the dynamic responses in a single axis.

[1]  M M Panjabi,et al.  In vivo measurements of spinal column vibrations. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Predicting the discomfort caused by simultaneous vertical and fore-and-aft whole-body vibration , 1988 .

[3]  Shoenberger Rw Intensity judgments of vibrations in the X axis, Z axis, and X-plus-Z axes. , 1987 .

[4]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body in the fore-and-aft and lateral directions , 1990 .

[5]  Ronnie Lundström,et al.  ABSORPTION OF ENERGY DURING WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION EXPOSURE , 1998 .

[6]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Assessing the discomfort of dual-axis whole-body vibration , 1977 .

[7]  M. Griffin,et al.  A MODAL ANALYSIS OF WHOLE-BODY VERTICAL VIBRATION, USING A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1997 .

[8]  K C Parsons,et al.  Vibration and comfort. I. Translational seat vibration. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[9]  N J Mansfield,et al.  The apparent mass of the human body exposed to non-orthogonal horizontal vibration. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Ronnie Lundström,et al.  Mechanical impedance of the human body in the horizontal direction , 1998 .

[11]  M. Griffin,et al.  A data correction method for surface measurement of vibration on the human body. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Tri-axial forces at the seat and backrest during whole-body fore-and-aft vibration , 2005 .

[13]  H Broman,et al.  Factors affecting the dynamic response of the seated subject. , 1990, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  B Hinz,et al.  Bidimensional accelerations of lumbar vertebrae and estimation of internal spinal load during sinusoidal vertical whole-body vibration: a pilot study. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  M J Griffin,et al.  The effects of vibration frequency and direction on the location of areas of discomfort caused by whole-body vibration. , 1978, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  M. Griffin,et al.  MOVEMENT OF THE UPPER-BODY OF SEATED SUBJECTS EXPOSED TO VERTICAL WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AT THE PRINCIPAL RESONANCE FREQUENCY , 1998 .

[17]  M J Griffin,et al.  The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head--I. Vertical seat vibration. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.