Effect of ethanol-wet bonding on porosity and retention of fiberglass post to root dentin.

This in vitro study aimed to assess the effects of different pretreatments used to adapt glass-fiber posts cemented to root canals with different resin cements, regarding porosity percentage and bond strength. Twelve bovine incisor roots were prepared with Largo drills. After post space preparation, the specimens were randomized into two types of pretreatment groups (n = 3): water-wet bonding and ethanol-wet bonding. After the post were cemented, the roots were stored in 100% humidity at room temperature for 7 days. The samples were scanned by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Images were reconstructed by NRecon software, and CTAn software was used to analyze the porosity percentage (%) at the luting interface. Evaluation of the push-out bond strength was performed by serially cutting the roots, and submitting the slices to testing. Additionally, the resin cement post-gel shrinkage values (%) were measured using the strain-gauge method (n = 10). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test and Student's t test (a = 0.05). The roots prepared with ethanol-wet bonding using RelyX™ U200 had significantly lower porosity in the coronal and apical thirds (p < 0.05). The group prepared with ethanol-wet bonding using RelyX™ ARC presented better bond strength results in the coronal and apical thirds (p < 0.05). RelyX™ ARC (0.97%) produced a higher post-gel shrinkage value than RelyX™ U200 (0.77%). Canals pretreated with ethanol-wet bonding presented better outcomes in regard to porosity percentage and push-out bond strength.

[1]  K. Bitter,et al.  Effect of Final Irrigation Protocol and Etching Mode on Bond Strength of a Multimode Adhesive in the Root Canal. , 2017, Journal of Adhesive Dentistry.

[2]  H. Arslan,et al.  Influence of oval and circular post placement using different resin cements on push-out bond strength and void volume analysed by micro-CT. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[3]  R. Ferreira,et al.  Bond strength of fiber posts to the root canal: Effects of anatomic root levels and resin cements. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  A. Versluis,et al.  Effect of Restorative Protocol on Cuspal Strain and Residual Stress in Endodontically Treated Molars. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[5]  C. Soares,et al.  Effect of Resin Cement Porosity on Retention of Glass-Fiber Posts to Root Dentin: An Experimental and Finite Element Analysis. , 2015, Brazilian dental journal.

[6]  A. Versluis,et al.  Effect of Photoactivation Timing on the Mechanical Properties of Resin Cements and Bond Strength of Fiberglass Post to Root Dentin. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[7]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  The effect of photopolymerization on the degree of conversion, polymerization kinetic, biaxial flexure strength, and modulus of self-adhesive resin cements. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  C. Soares,et al.  Correlation between polymerization stress and interfacial integrity of composites restorations assessed by different in vitro tests. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  N. King,et al.  Effect of chlorhexidine and ethanol-wet bonding with a hydrophobic adhesive to intraradicular dentine. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  R. Oréfice,et al.  The effect of light-curing access and different resin cements on apical bond strength of fiber posts. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[11]  R. Moraes,et al.  The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[12]  U. Blunck,et al.  Do chlorhexidine and ethanol improve bond strength and durability of adhesion of fiber posts inside the root canal? , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[13]  L. Witek,et al.  MicroCT analysis of a retrieved root restored with a bonded fiber-reinforced composite dowel: a pilot study. , 2013, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[14]  A. Versluis,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage stresses in a premolar restored with different composite resins and different incremental techniques. , 2013, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[15]  C. Soares,et al.  Fiber post etching with hydrogen peroxide: effect of concentration and application time. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  L. Breschi,et al.  Effect of ethanol application on post-luting to intraradicular dentine. , 2009, International endodontic journal.

[17]  Adam M. Donnelly,et al.  Application of hydrophobic resin adhesives to acid-etched dentin with an alternative wet bonding technique. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[18]  F. Tay,et al.  Bonding BisGMA to Dentin—a Proof of Concept for Hydrophobic Dentin Bonding , 2007, Journal of dental research.

[19]  M. Cinelli,et al.  The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  Adam M. Donnelly,et al.  From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. , 2007, American journal of dentistry.

[21]  S. H. Dickens,et al.  Network structure of Bis-GMA- and UDMA-based resin systems. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  Marcelo Giannini,et al.  Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  M. Gagliani,et al.  Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[25]  W H Douglas,et al.  Strain gauge method for measuring polymerization contraction of composite restoratives. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.