Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments

For sequential experiments with K treatments, we establish two formal optimization criteria to find optimal allocation strategies. Both criteria involve the sample sizes on each treatment and a concave noncentrality parameter from a multivariate test. We show that these two criteria are equivalent. We apply this result to specific questions: (1) How do we maximize power of a multivariate test of homogeneity with binary response?, and (2) for fixed power, how do we minimize expected treatment failures? Because the solutions depend on unknown parameters, we describe a response-adaptive randomization procedure that “targets” the optimal allocation and provides increases in power along the lines of 2–4% over complete randomization for equal allocation. The increase in power contradicts the conclusions of other authors who have explored other randomization procedures for K = 2 and have found that the variability induced by randomization negates any benefit of targeting an optimal allocation.

[1]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2009 .

[2]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[3]  A. Hayter The Maximum Familywise Error Rate of Fisher's Least Significant Difference Test , 1986 .

[4]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[5]  B. Turnbull,et al.  A class of simple approximate sequential tests for adaptive comparison of two treatments , 1981 .

[6]  Connie Page,et al.  Variability in Adaptive Designs for Estimation of Success Probabilities , 1998 .

[7]  Michael Woodroofe,et al.  Central Limit Theorems for Doubly Adaptive Biased Coin Designs , 1995 .

[8]  Vic Hasselblad,et al.  Power calculations for large multi‐arm placebo‐controlled studies of dichotomous outcomes , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  KyungMann Kim Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 2001 .

[10]  W. R. Thompson ON THE LIKELIHOOD THAT ONE UNKNOWN PROBABILITY EXCEEDS ANOTHER IN VIEW OF THE EVIDENCE OF TWO SAMPLES , 1933 .

[11]  Ronald Christensen Plane Answers to Complex Questions , 1987 .

[12]  Ronald Christensen,et al.  Plane Answers to Complex Questions: The Theory of Linear Models , 1989 .

[13]  Jeffrey R. Eisele The doubly adaptive biased coin design for sequential clinical trials , 1994 .

[14]  L. Hayre Two-population sequential tests with three hypotheses , 1979 .

[15]  J. Lachin Sample size determinants for r X c comparative trials. , 1977, Biometrics.

[16]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials , 2003 .

[17]  Feifang Hu,et al.  Doubly adaptive biased coin designs with delayed responses , 2008 .