Impact of Domain Knowledge on Information Presentation Format Choice: A Cognitive Fit Perspective

Prior research has established the effect of presentation format on decision making performance. However, the effect of domain knowledge on presentation format choice has not been investigated. In the business context, reports are often generated by report designers who lack domain knowledge and the reports are used by decision makers who possess substantial domain knowledge. Drawing from the Cognitive Fit Theory and the domain knowledge and presentation format literature, this study argues that report designers and decision makers have different mental models of the problems and solutions due to differences in their domain knowledge. Hence, we posit that report designers will choose report formats that fit with their own mental models rather than the mental models of the decision makers. The lack of cognitive fit between the mental models and presentation format for the decision makers could lead to sub-optimal performances. Other implications for research and practice have been discussed.

[1]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Effects of Domain Knowledge, Working Memory Capacity, and Age on Cognitive Performance: An Investigation of the Knowledge-Is-Power Hypothesis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Vicki L. Sauter,et al.  Intuitive decision-making , 1999, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effect of Relationship Encoding, Task Type, and Complexity on Information Representation: An Empirical Evaluation of 2D and 3D Line Graphs , 2004, MIS Q..

[4]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  A tour through the visualization zoo , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  A Comparative Study of How Experts and Novices Use a Decision Aid to Solve Problems in Complex Knowledge Domains , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Blake Ives,et al.  Graphical User Interfaces for Business Information Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[7]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise makes the world slow down: Judgements of duration are influenced by domain knowledge , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Show Me: Automatic Presentation for Visual Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Color and Graphical Information Presentation Under Varying Time Constraints , 1986, MIS Q..

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Influence of Color and Graphical Information Presentation in a Managerial Decision Simulation , 1986, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[12]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Using Visual Representations of Data to Enhance Sensemaking in Data Exploration Tasks , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  W. Cleveland.  The elements of graphing data , 1986 .

[14]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[15]  Cynthia Frownfelter-Lohrke,et al.  The effects of differing information presentations of general purpose financial statements on users' decisions , 1998 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Use of Explanations in Knowledge-Based Systems: Cognitive Perspective and a Process-Tracing Analysis , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Ronald N. Taylor,et al.  Relative contribution of decision-maker attributes to decision processes , 1974 .

[18]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Boryung Ju.  Does domain knowledge matter: Mapping users' expertise to their information interactions , 2007 .

[20]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[21]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Fast searching for information on the Internet to use in a learning context: The impact of domain knowledge , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[23]  William N. Dilla,et al.  Interactive Data Visualization: New Directions for Accounting Information Systems Research , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Andrea Seaton Kelton,et al.  The Effects of Information Presentation Format on Judgment and Decision Making: A Review of the Information Systems Research , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  A Tour through the Visualization Zoo , 2010 .

[26]  Sury Ravindran,et al.  The Effect of Visual Illusions on the Graphical Display of Information , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  F. Bolger,et al.  Graphs versus tables: Effects of data presentation format on judgemental forecasting , 1996 .

[28]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[29]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  The Effectiveness Of Graphic And Tabular Presentation Under Time Pressure And Task Complexity , 1995 .

[30]  William Remus,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Graphical and Tabular Data Presentations on Decision Making , 1984 .

[31]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge and Task Characteristics in Decision Making , 1995 .

[32]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings , 1986, CACM.

[33]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Chartjunk or Goldgraph? Effects of Presentation Objectives and Content Desirability on Information Presentation , 1999, MIS Q..

[34]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  The influence of domain knowledge on the functional capacity of working memory , 2009 .

[35]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 1996, AI Mag..

[36]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Some MIS Design Variables , 1977, MIS Q..

[37]  R. W. Driver,et al.  The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information , 1983, MIS Q..

[38]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making , 1981 .

[39]  Angelina Villarreal,et al.  PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF GRAPHIC AND TABULAR DISPLAYS OF MULTIVARIATE DATA , 1987 .

[40]  P. Saariluoma,et al.  Chess players' intake of task-relevant cues , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Chartjunk or goldgraph? Effects of persenataion objectives and content desirability on information presentation: effects of presentation objectives and content desirability on information presentation , 1999 .

[42]  Boryung Ju,et al.  Does domain knowledge matter: Mapping users' expertise to their information interactions , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[43]  E. Cardinaels.  The interplay between cost accounting knowledge and presentation formats in cost-based decision-making , 2008 .

[44]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Palash Bera,et al.  A Cognitive Perspective on How Experts Develop Conceptual Models in Complex Domains , 2010, AMCIS.

[46]  Magnus Boman,et al.  Implementing an agent trade server , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[48]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship Between Software Comprehension and Modification , 2006, MIS Q..

[49]  J. Starkes,et al.  Perception in Sport: Volleyball , 1980 .

[50]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines , 1988, CACM.

[51]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Visualization of Network Concepts: The Impact of Working Memory Capacity Differences , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Vinod Kumar Malhotra,et al.  Domain experts influence decision quality: Towards a robust method for their identification , 2007 .

[53]  O. M.MehdiOwrang.  Using domain knowledge to optimize the knowledge discovery process in databases , 2000, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[54]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Incorporating domain knowledge into data mining classifiers: An application in indirect lending , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[55]  Frederick L. Oswald,et al.  Does Domain Knowledge Moderate Involvement of Working Memory Capacity in Higher-Level Cognition? A Test of Three Models. , 2005 .

[56]  James A. Senn,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments , 1977 .

[57]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[59]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  Richard B. Dull,et al.  A Comparison of Three Visual Representations of Complex Multidimensional Accounting Information , 1999, J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  J. Wiley.  Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[62]  David P. Tegarden,et al.  Business Information Visualization , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[64]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[65]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.