Evaluation of Semen Self-Sampling Yield Predictors and CTC Isolation by Multi-Color Flow Cytometry for Liquid Biopsy of Localized Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary There is a growing trend towards exploring the use of non-invasive liquid biopsy (LB) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. The primary objective of this study is to identify the rate of patients who accepted and were able to collect seminal fluid. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficiency of our protocol in collecting prostate-derived cells. Our study shows that only one third (139/356) of patients affected by locally advanced PCa, who accepted to collect their seminal fluid, were able to donate. The main favorable predictors for semen collection were young age and lower prostate volume. Putative cancer cells (PSMA + EpCAMhigh) were 2% of the isolated cells in urine and semen. The fraction of EpCAMhigh cells over prostate-enriched cells (PSMA+) significantly correlated with patient age in both semen and urine, but not with other clinical parameters. Abstract Liquid biopsy (LB) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection could represent an alternative to biopsy. Seminal fluid (SF) is a source of PCa-specific biomarkers, as 40% of ejaculate derives from the prostate. We tested the feasibility of an SF-based LB by evaluating the yield of semen self-sampling in a cohort of >750 patients with clinically localized PCa. The overall SF collection yield was 18.2% (39% when considering only compliant patients), with about a half of the patients (53.15%) not consenting to SF donation. Independent favorable predictors for SF collection were younger age and lower prostate volume. We implemented a protocol to enrich prostate-derived cells by multi-color flow cytometry and applied it on SF and urine samples from 100 patients. The number of prostate-enriched cells (SYTO-16+ PSMA+ CD45−) was variable, with higher numbers of cells isolated from SF than urine (p value < 0.001). Putative cancer cells (EpCAMhigh) were 2% of isolated cells in both specimens. The fraction of EpCAMhigh cells over prostate-enriched cells (PSMA+) significantly correlated with patient age in both semen and urine, but not with other clinical parameters, such as Gleason Score, ISUP, or TNM stage. Hence, enumeration of prostate-derived cells is not sufficient to guide PCa diagnosis; additional molecular analyses to detect patient-specific cancer lesions will be needed.

[1]  A. Zvyagin,et al.  Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2022, Biomedicines.

[2]  J. Thiery,et al.  Isolation of Circulating Tumor Cells from Seminal Fluid of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Inertial Microfluidics , 2022, Cancers.

[3]  Chandrahas Koumar Ratnacaram,et al.  Circulating metabolite biomarkers: a game changer in the human prostate cancer diagnosis , 2022, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[4]  W. Oyen,et al.  EAU-EANM Consensus Statements on the Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Prostate Cancer and with Respect to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy. , 2022, European urology oncology.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2022 , 2022, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  M. Nowicki,et al.  Clinical Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Prostate Cancer Management , 2021, Biomedicines.

[7]  A. Koyanagi,et al.  Ejaculation Disorders in Male Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence , 2021, The Journal of urology.

[8]  N. Salem,et al.  Impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on the risk of depression and anxiety , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[9]  A. Minervini,et al.  Alfuzosin for the medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis , 2021, Therapeutic advances in urology.

[10]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2020, European urology.

[11]  C. Sharpley,et al.  Depression and prostate cancer: implications for urologists and oncologists , 2020, Nature Reviews Urology.

[12]  P. Paterlini-Bréchot,et al.  Clinical Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer , 2019, Cells.

[13]  D. Leong,et al.  Depression and prostate cancer: A focused review for the clinician. , 2019, Urologic oncology.

[14]  S. Aedo,et al.  10 Year Biochemical Failure Free Survival of Men with CD82 Positive Primary Circulating Prostate Cells Treated by Radical Prostatectomy , 2018, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[15]  G. Veronesi,et al.  PD06-10 LIQUID BIOPSY BY PROSTATE-DERIVED TUMOR CELLS ENRICHED FROM SEMINAL FLUID (SF): THE SEMEN PROSTATE CANCER TUMOR ELEMENTS (SPECTRE) PROJECT. , 2018 .

[16]  V. Velculescu,et al.  Cancer DNA in the Circulation: The Liquid Biopsy. , 2017, JAMA.

[17]  L. Egevad,et al.  A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. , 2016, European urology.

[18]  B. Delahunt,et al.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[19]  R. Gardiner,et al.  Seminal fluid: a useful source of prostate cancer biomarkers? , 2015, Biomarkers in medicine.

[20]  H. Cho,et al.  Silodosin for the treatment of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability , 2014, Research and Reports in Urology.

[21]  M. Carini,et al.  Morbidity and psychological impact of prostate biopsy: the future calls for a change , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[22]  Evyatar Marienberg Traditional Jewish Sexual Practices and Their Possible Impact on Jewish Fertility and Demography* , 2013, Harvard Theological Review.

[23]  N. Masumori,et al.  Inhibition of Seminal emission is the main cause of anejaculation induced by a new highly selective alpha1A-blocker in normal volunteers. , 2008, The journal of sexual medicine.

[24]  Donald Wlodkowic,et al.  SYTO probes in the cytometry of tumor cell death , 2008, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[25]  A. Bohnen,et al.  Determinants of ejaculatory dysfunction in a community‐based longitudinal study , 2007 .

[26]  E. Tippett,et al.  Discrimination of live and early apoptotic mononuclear cells by the fluorescent SYTO 16 vital dye. , 2005, Journal of immunological methods.

[27]  H. Ragde,et al.  Method for identifying prostate cells in semen using flow cytometry , 1998, The Prostate.

[28]  M. Lavin,et al.  Abnormal prostatic cells in ejaculates from men with prostatic cancer--a preliminary report. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[29]  A. Hirsh Post-coital sperm retrieval could lead to the wider approval of assisted conception by some religions. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[30]  H. Lilja A kallikrein-like serine protease in prostatic fluid cleaves the predominant seminal vesicle protein. , 1985, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[31]  L. Goulart,et al.  Research landscape of liquid biopsies in prostate cancer. , 2019, American journal of cancer research.

[32]  A. Tinker,et al.  in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer A Phase II Pharmacodynamic Study of Preoperative Figitumumab , 2012 .