On-Site Information Systems Design for Emergency First Responders

This paper explores the design specification of on-site emergency response information systems. In particular how emerging technologies such as wireless sensor networks, RFID, and wireless communication technologies, might enable on-site dynamic information to be retrieved, shared, and presented to the first responders. The information needed for an emergency response is discussed and end-user requirements are identified through extensive interviews with fire fighters together with observation made of fire emergency response training simulations. These requirements are considered in relation to the identified responsibilities of the core members in the first responder hierarchy. On-site dynamic information collection is discussed in terms of wireless sensor networks and radio frequency identification technologies, and information sharing among the first responders is implemented based on a local wireless communication network. The on-site dynamic information required by emergency personnel is presented at three situation awareness levels in order to meet the various requirements of the first responders. Finally, a prototype information system for fire and rescue services is discussed to illustrate and evaluate the methods proposed in this paper. This work outlines the basic design principles and practice of on-site information systems for emergency first responders and shows that such an information system could greatly improve their performance as well as reducing the risks they face, once the emerging technologies are in place to implement them. Although our focus was on structural fire and fire fighters, the on-site emergency response system proposed here is applicable to other emergency response as well, due to the existence of common training methods and standard operating procedures.

[1]  Shuang-Hua Yang,et al.  RFID Sensor Network Network Architectures to Integrate RFID, Sensor and WSN , 2007 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[3]  Nalini Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Project rescue: challenges in responding to the unexpected , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[4]  M. Turoff,et al.  Session details: Emergency response information systems: emerging trends and technologies , 2007 .

[5]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  A study of emergency response work: patterns of mobile phone interaction , 2007, CHI.

[6]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Past and future emergency response information systems , 2002, CACM.

[7]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Challenges in designing interactive systems for emergency response , 2006, DIS '06.

[8]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[9]  Shuang-Hua Yang,et al.  Genetic algorithm based software integration with minimum software risk , 2006, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  James A. Landay,et al.  Ubiquitous computing for firefighters: field studies and prototypes of large displays for incident command , 2004, CHI '04.

[11]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[12]  Shuang-Hua Yang,et al.  SafetyNET/A Wireless Sensor Network for Fire Protection and Emergency Responses , 2006 .

[13]  Michael J. Albers Goal-driven task analysis: improving situation awareness for complex problem-solving , 1998, SIGDOC '98.

[14]  Daniel A. Steingart,et al.  Design of monocular head-mounted displays for increased indoor firefighting safety and efficiency , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[16]  B. S. Manoj,et al.  Communication challenges in emergency response , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[17]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Sensor networks for emergency response: challenges and opportunities , 2004, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[18]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  Making action visible in time-critical work , 2006, CHI.

[19]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Handy navigation in ever-changing spaces: an ethnographic study of firefighting practices , 2008, DIS '08.

[20]  Annelli Jf The National Incident Management System: a multi-agency approach to emergency response in the United States of America , 2006 .

[21]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  Managing the Response to Disasters Using Microcomputers , 1984 .

[22]  Simon Dr. rer. nat. Brattke,et al.  Head Mounted Displays for Fire Fighters , 2006 .

[23]  Lili Yang,et al.  On-site information sharing for emergency response management , 2007 .

[24]  Xiang Yao,et al.  The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (DERMIS) , 2004 .

[25]  J F Annelli,et al.  The national incident management system: a multi-agency approach to emergency response in the United States of America. , 2006, Revue scientifique et technique.

[26]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Participatory design in emergency medical service: designing for future practice , 2006, CHI.

[27]  Mats Danielsson The congnitive structure of decision making tasks in major versus minor emergency responses , 1998 .

[28]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Human-computer interaction , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[29]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Emergency Response Systems: The Utility Y2k Experience , 2004 .