In search of practitioner‐based social capital: a social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in a US‐based STEM professional development program

This paper presents the first in a series of studies on the informal advice networks of a community of teachers in an in‐service professional development program. The aim of the research was to use Social Network Analysis as a methodological tool to reveal the social networks developed by the teachers, and to examine whether these networks maximized teachers’ access to practitioner‐based social capital. We define practitioner‐based social capital as the knowledge and resources for teaching practice that are accessible through a social network. Our findings indicated that teachers did not naturally build advice networks that would cultivate the highest levels of practitioner‐based social capital. This study offers new possibilities for social network research on teachers’ learning communities in understanding the dynamics of teacher networks. Further, program facilitators will use this information to strategically foster improved teacher collaboration and learning, which will be described in forthcoming studies in this series.

[1]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations , 2004 .

[2]  Margaret Riel,et al.  Analyzing Teachers’ Professional Interactions in a School as Social Capital: A Social Network Approach , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[3]  Ann Lieberman.  Networks as Learning Communities , 2000 .

[4]  Curriculum Reform and New Practices in Classrooms and Teacher Courses , 2004 .

[5]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[6]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[7]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[8]  K. Au.  Vygotsky and education: Changes in a teacher's views of interactive comprehension instruction , 1990 .

[9]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[10]  Ann S. Rosebery,et al.  Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings from Language Minority Classrooms. , 1992 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The ‘New’ Science of Networks and the Challenge of School Change , 2007 .

[13]  J. Calderhead,et al.  Teachers' Professional Learning , 1988 .

[14]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange☆ , 1996 .

[15]  Nan Lin,et al.  SOCIAL NETWORKS AND STATUS ATTAINMENT , 1999 .

[16]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[17]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[18]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Karen Swan,et al.  Situated Professional Development and Technology Integration: The Capital Area Technology and Inquiry in Education (CATIE) Mentoring Program , 2002 .

[20]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[21]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[22]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  How Exemplary Computer-Using Teachers Differ From Other Teachers: Implications for Realizing the Po , 1994 .

[23]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[24]  R. Elmore.  Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[25]  P. Abrami.  Understanding and Promoting Complex Learning Using Technology , 2001 .

[26]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[27]  Susan A. Yoon,et al.  Feedback (F) Fueling Adaptation (A) Network Growth (N) and Self-Organization (S): A Complex Systems Design and Evaluation Approach to Professional Development , 2006 .

[28]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency’s Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform , 1997 .

[29]  A. Daly,et al.  Relationships in reform: the role of teachers' social networks , 2010 .

[30]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Networks in the knowledge economy , 2003 .

[31]  C. Coburn,et al.  Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change , 2003 .

[32]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[33]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[34]  R. Ingersoll.  Turnover Among Mathematics and Science Teachers in the U.S. , 2000 .

[35]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[36]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[37]  Charles E. Bidwell,et al.  The Collegial Focus: Teaching Fields, Collegial Relationships, and Instructional Practice in American High Schools. , 1999 .

[38]  R. Bullough,et al.  First-Year Teacher Eight Years Later: An Inquiry into Teacher Development , 1997 .

[39]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[40]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[41]  C. Dede,et al.  Scaling Up Success : Lessons Learned from Technology-Based Educational Improvement , 2005 .

[42]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[43]  H. Becker.  Who's wired and who's not: children's access to and use of computer technology. , 2000, The Future of children.

[44]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[45]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[46]  K. Frank,et al.  Social Capital and the Diffusion of Innovations Within Organizations: The Case of Computer Technology in Schools , 2004 .

[47]  Ann Ooms,et al.  Content-Focused Technology Inquiry Groups , 2004 .

[48]  Ina Finke,et al.  SELaKT - Social Network Analysis as a Method for Expert Localisation and Sustainable Knowledge Transfer , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[49]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[50]  C. Coburn,et al.  Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities , 2001 .

[51]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[52]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .