Charge State Coalescence During Electrospray Ionization Improves Peptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry

We report the effects of supercharging reagents dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and m-nitrobenzyl alcohol (m-NBA) applied to untargeted peptide identification, with special emphasis on non-tryptic peptides. Peptides generated from a mixture of five standard proteins digested with trypsin, elastase, or pepsin were separated with nanoflow liquid chromatography using mobile phases modified with either 5 % DMSO or 0.1 % m-NBA. Eluting peptides were ionized by online electrospray and sequenced by both CID and ETD using data-dependent MS/MS. Statistically significant improvements in peptide identifications were observed with DMSO co-solvent. In order to understand this observation, we assessed the effects of supercharging reagents on the chromatographic separation and the electrospray quality. The increase in identifications was not due to supercharging, which was greater for the 0.1 % m-NBA co-solvent and not observed for the 5.0 % DMSO co-solvent. The improved MS/MS efficiency using the DMSO modified mobile phase appeared to result from charge state coalescence.

[1]  J. Loo,et al.  New reagents for increasing ESI multiple charging of proteins and protein complexes , 2010, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[2]  P. Pevzner,et al.  The Generating Function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD Pairs of Tandem Mass Spectra: Applications to Database Search* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  Christopher J. Hogan,et al.  Monte carlo simulation of macromolecular ionization by nanoelectrospray , 2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[4]  Thomas Hankemeier,et al.  Simultaneous quantitative analysis of metabolites using ion-pair liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  J. Loo,et al.  Top-Down Mass Spectrometry of Supercharged Native Protein-Ligand Complexes. , 2011, International journal of mass spectrometry.

[6]  K. Markides,et al.  Studies of signal suppression in liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using volatile ion-pairing reagents. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  L. Konermann,et al.  Modeling the behavior of coarse-grained polymer chains in charged water droplets: implications for the mechanism of electrospray ionization. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  O. Jensen,et al.  Peptide sequencing and characterization of post-translational modifications by enhanced ion-charging and liquid chromatography electron-transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Proton transfer reactions of multiply charged peptide and protein cations and anions , 1995 .

[11]  G. McAlister,et al.  Decision tree–driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics , 2008, Nature Methods.

[12]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[13]  R. Abagyan,et al.  XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  J. Yates,et al.  Statistical characterization of ion trap tandem mass spectra from doubly charged tryptic peptides. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Ping Chen,et al.  Sodium-deoxycholate-assisted tryptic digestion and identification of proteolytically resistant proteins. , 2008, Analytical biochemistry.

[16]  Kumaran Kandasamy,et al.  Systematic evaluation of alternating CID and ETD fragmentation for phosphorylated peptides , 2011, Proteomics.

[17]  E. Williams,et al.  Real-time hydrogen/deuterium exchange kinetics via supercharged electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  M. Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[19]  J. Strutt.  Scientific Papers: On the Equilibrium of Liquid Conducting Masses charged with Electricity , 2009 .

[20]  Cécile Boscher,et al.  Differential Impact of Caveolae and Caveolin-1 Scaffolds on The Membrane Raft Proteome* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Collisional effects on the charge distribution of ions from large molecules, formed by electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometry , 1988 .

[22]  E. Williams,et al.  Mechanism of charging and supercharging molecules in electrospray ionization. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  M. Mann,et al.  Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules , 1990 .

[24]  J. Yates,et al.  Multidimensional LC separations in shotgun proteomics. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  J. Coon,et al.  Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[26]  C. Mallet,et al.  A study of ion suppression effects in electrospray ionization from mobile phase additives and solid-phase extracts. , 2004, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[27]  M. Emmett,et al.  New reagents for enhanced liquid chromatographic separation and charging of intact protein ions for electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  E. Williams,et al.  Effects of supercharging reagents on noncovalent complex structure in electrospray ionization from aqueous solutions , 2010, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[29]  G. McAlister,et al.  Supplemental activation method for high-efficiency electron-transfer dissociation of doubly protonated peptide precursors. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[31]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Mann,et al.  Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast , 2008, Nature.

[33]  L. Rayleigh.  XX. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting masses charged with electricity , 1882 .

[34]  A. Venter,et al.  Investigating the Role of Adducts in Protein Supercharging with Sulfolane , 2012, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[35]  M. Wilm.  Principles of Electrospray Ionization , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[36]  E. Williams,et al.  Supercharging in electrospray ionization: effects on signal and charge , 2002 .

[37]  S. Ficarro,et al.  Improved electrospray ionization efficiency compensates for diminished chromatographic resolution and enables proteomics analysis of tyrosine signaling in embryonic stem cells. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  Robert Burke,et al.  ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development , 2008, Bioinform..

[39]  P. Brown,et al.  Effects of mobile-phase additives, solution pH, ionization constant, and analyte concentration on the sensitivities and electrospray ionization mass spectra of nucleoside antiviral agents. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[40]  K. Håkansson,et al.  Ion Activation Methods for Tandem Mass Spectrometry , 2012 .

[41]  J. Prell,et al.  Protein Conformation and Supercharging with DMSO from Aqueous Solution , 2011, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.