General guidelines for the estimation of committed effective dose from incorporation monitoring data : (Project IDEAS - EU contract no. FIKR-CT2001-00160)

Doses from intakes of radionuclides cannot be measured but must be assessed from monitoring, such as whole body counting or urinary excretion measurements. Such assessments require application of a biokinetic model and estimation of the exposure time, material properties, etc. Because of the variety of parameters involved, the results of such assessments may vary over a wide range, according to the skill and the experience of the assessor. The need for harmonisation of assessment procedures has been recognised in a research project carried out under the EU 5 th Framework Programme. The aim of the project IDEAS (partly funded by the European Commission under contract No. FIKR-CT2001-00160) was to develop general guidelines for assessments of intakes and internal doses from individual monitoring data. The IDEAS project started in October 2001 and ended in June 2005. To ensure that the guidelines are applicable to a wide range of practical situations, a database was compiled of cases of internal contamination that include monitoring data suitable for assessment. About 50 cases from the database were analized by different assessors, the results were collated, and differences in assumptions identified, with their effects on the assessed doses. From the results, and other investigations, draft guidelines were prepared, to provide a systematic procedure for estimating the required parameter values that are not part of the measurement data. A virtual workshop was held on the Internet, open to internal dosimetry professionals, to discuss the draft guidelines, which were revised accordingly. In collaboration with the IAEA, an intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment was then conducted, which was also open to all involved in internal dosimetry. Six cases were developed and circulated with a copy of the revised guidelines, which participants were encouraged to follow, to test their applicability and effectiveness. The results were collated and a Workshop held to discuss the results with the participants. The guidelines were refined on the basis of the experience and discussion. The guidelines are based on a general philosophy of: • Harmonisation: by following the Guidelines any two assessors should obtain the same estimate of dose from a given data set. • Accuracy: the "best" estimate of dose should be obtained from the available data. • Proportionality: the effort applied to the evaluation should be proportionate to the dose - the lower the dose, the simpler the process should be. Following these principles, the Guidelines use the following "Levels of task" to structure the approach to an evaluation: Level 0: Annual dose 6 mSv). The guidelines provide: • Background information about the biokinetic models and the corresponding bioassay functions for the interpretation of monitoring data. • Detailed information about the handling and evaluation of monitoring data. • A structured approach to dose assessment consisting of a step-by-step procedure described in well-defined flowcharts with accompanying explanatory text.

[1]  David M Taylor The Metabolism of Plutonium and Related Elements: ICRP Publication 48 , 1989 .

[2]  T. R. La Bone,et al.  Intake retention functions and their applications to bioassay and the estimation of internal radiation doses. , 1988, Health physics.

[3]  H. Métivier A new model for the human alimentary tract: the work of a Committee 2 task group. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  A. James,et al.  USTUR CASE 0259 WHOLE BODY DONATION: A COMPREHENSIVE TEST OF THE CURRENT ICRP MODELS FOR THE BEHAVIOR OF INHALED 238PuO2 CERAMIC PARTICLES , 2003, Health physics.

[5]  M. Bailey,et al.  Practical application of the ICRP Human Respiratory Tract Model. , 1998, Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

[6]  K. Heid,et al.  Interpretation of human urinary excretion of plutonium for cases treated with DTPA. , 1972, Health physics.

[7]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  (Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intakes of Radionuclides) , 1991 .

[8]  Icrp Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 4 Inhalation dose coefficients , 1995, Annals of the ICRP.

[9]  D. Taylor,et al.  Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1996 .

[10]  Wissenschaftliche Berichte,et al.  Third European Intercomparison Exercise on Internal Dose Assessment Results of a Research Programme in the Framework of the EULEP/EURADOS Action Group "Derivation of Parameter Values for Application to the New Model of the Human Respiratory Tract for Occupational Exposure" , 2000 .

[11]  G Miller,et al.  Bayesian internal dosimetry calculations using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  T. Jenner,et al.  The carcinogenic effect of localized fission fragment irradiation of rat lung. , 1980, International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics Chemistry and Medicine.

[13]  H. Martz,et al.  Internal dosimetry intake estimation using bayesian methods , 1999 .

[14]  A. Martell,et al.  Actinides in the Environment and Their Uptake by Man , 1975 .

[15]  J. Vennart Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers: ICRP Publication 30. , 1981, Health physics.

[16]  Ilya A Likhtarev,et al.  Internal Dosimetry Support System: Multipurpose Research Computer Code , 1998 .

[17]  N Ishigure,et al.  Review of methods and computer codes for interpretation of bioassay data. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  M R Bailey,et al.  DETERMINATION OF THE PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, BIOKINETICS, AND DOSE COEFFICIENTS OF URANIUM COMPOUNDS HANDLED DURING NUCLEAR FUEL FABRICATION IN FRANCE , 2002, Health physics.

[19]  V. Berkovski Application of the Internal Dosimetry Support System for Interpretation of In Vivo and Bioassay Measurements , 2000 .

[20]  P. Jackson,et al.  Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 5. Compilation of ingestion and inhalation dose coefficients. , 1996, Annals of the ICRP.

[21]  Filipy Re,et al.  USTUR CASE 0259 WHOLE BODY DONATION: A COMPREHENSIVE TEST OF THE CURRENT ICRP MODELS FOR THE BEHAVIOR OF INHALED 238PuO2 CERAMIC PARTICLES , 2003 .

[22]  E. Bende Plutonium Burning in a Pebble-Bed Type High Temperature Nuclear Reactor , 2000 .

[23]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[24]  M. R. Bailey,et al.  Particle Size Distributions of Radioactive Aerosols Measured in Workplaces , 1995 .

[25]  C. M. Castellani,et al.  IDEAS Work Package 3 Evaluation of Incorporation Cases , 2004 .

[26]  C. Potter INTAKE RETENTION FRACTIONS DEVELOPED FROM MODELS USED IN THE DETERMINATION OF DOSE COEFFICIENTS DEVELOPED FOR ICRP PUBLICATION 68—PARTICULATE INHALATION , 2002, Health physics.

[27]  A Birchall,et al.  IMBA Expert: internal dosimetry made simple. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[28]  H. Martz,et al.  Using exact Poisson likelihood functions in Bayesian interpretation of counting measurements. , 2002, Health physics.

[29]  D. Kocher ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES , 2000 .

[30]  Dai-ichi Nuclear Accident,et al.  The International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1963, Nature.