Improvement Least-Distance Measure Model with Coplanar DMU on Strong Hyperplanes

Technique of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) involves methods conducted for desirable objective management of Decision Making Unit (DMU) that is same increasing of efficiency level. Data envelopment analysis furthermore determines the efficiency level, provides situation, removes inefficiency with evaluated benchmarking information. In this paper the use of the improvement Least-Distance measure with relation previous model by coplanar DMU, is proposed for computational dissipation at assess distance on these interior combinations, for determination the shortest projection from a considered unit to the strongly efficient production frontier. Therefore locate nearest path to improvement efficiency the evaluated DMU.

[1]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[2]  Jaap Spronk,et al.  Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[4]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Finding strong defining hyperplanes of Production Possibility Set , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  MC Gouveia,et al.  Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A SIMPLE CHARACTERIZATION OF RETURNS TO SCALE IN DEA , 1996 .

[7]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[9]  Douglas M. Hawkins,et al.  A statistically rigorous approach for improving simulation methodology , 2003, The Ninth International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, 2003. HPCA-9 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  Tarmo Räty Efficient Facet Based Efficiency Index: A Variable Returns to Scale Specification , 2002 .

[11]  Eduardo González,et al.  From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Efficiency Evaluations Based on Potential (Non-Proportional) Improvements , 1999 .

[13]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Computational strategy for Russell measure in DEA: Second-order cone programming , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Chulwoo Baek,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[15]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA , 1999 .

[16]  E. Autio,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth , 2004 .