Habitat suitability is a poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating movements

Resistance values based on habitat suitability are frequently the basis for modeling landscape connectivity and designing wildlife corridors to facilitate dispersal movements. However, animals may use the landscape differently during dispersal movements than in the home range. We hypothesized that (1) habitat features that are avoided within an animal’s home range offer little resistance to animals during natal or breeding dispersal and more specifically that (2) resistance to dispersal is a negative exponential function of habitat suitability within the home range. To test these hypotheses, we used field movement data of kinkajous (Potos flavus), a neotropical, arboreal mammal, to parameterize alternative resistance surfaces based on home range resource use, home range movement data, parent-offspring locations, and breeding pair locations. We used correlation analysis to compare performance of these surfaces. Our results suggest that kinkajous perceive the fragmented landscape as more connected during dispersal than while in the home range. Although kinkajous are tightly linked to forest during movements in the home range, farms and pastures did not pose higher resistance to dispersal movements than forests. Similar tolerance for low-quality habitat has now been observed in dispersal movements of several wildlife species. A negative exponential relationship between habitat suitability and resistance characterizes landscape connectivity perception of mobile species during dispersal movements. If mobile animals can readily traverse habitat of lower quality, large fractions of the landscape may offer low resistance, allowing greater flexibility in where a corridor is located.

[1]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[2]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The social organization of the kinkajou Potos flavus (Procyonidae) , 2001 .

[4]  Ran Nathan,et al.  The importance of long‐distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation , 2005 .

[5]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[6]  G. Luikart,et al.  Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[7]  Andrew J. Edelman.  Multiple socioecological factors influence timing of natal dispersal in kangaroo rats , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  Klaus Reinhardt,et al.  Low dispersal ability and habitat specificity promote extinctions in rare but not in widespread species: the Orthoptera of Germany , 2005 .

[9]  L. Waits,et al.  The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification , 2007, Conservation Genetics.

[10]  M. Fortin,et al.  Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[11]  J. Rhymer,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION BY WOOD TURTLES (CLEMMYS INSCULPTA): AN APPLICATION OF PAIRED LOGISTIC REGRESSION , 2002 .

[12]  C. Peres,et al.  Gap‐crossing movements predict species occupancy in Amazonian forest fragments , 2009 .

[13]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .

[14]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Using step and path selection functions for estimating resistance to movement: pumas as a case study , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Ruslan Kalendar,et al.  Java web tools for PCR, in silico PCR, and oligonucleotide assembly and analysis. , 2011, Genomics.

[16]  S. Cushman,et al.  A comparative framework to infer landscape effects on population genetic structure: are habitat suitability models effective in explaining gene flow? , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  Does wildlife resource selection accurately inform corridor conservation , 2017 .

[18]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus , 2006 .

[19]  Mauricio O. Carneiro,et al.  From FastQ Data to High‐Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline , 2013, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[20]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[21]  David O. Wallin,et al.  Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of kinkajou social organization , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[23]  M. A. Donnelly,et al.  Evaluating connectivity for tropical amphibians using empirically derived resistance surfaces. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  J. Hadfield,et al.  How much can parentage analyses tell us about precapture dispersal? , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[25]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  DISPERSAL DISTANCE OF MAMMALS IS PROPORTIONAL TO HOME RANGE SIZE , 2002 .

[26]  J. Hilty.  Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation , 2006 .

[27]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography , 2014 .

[28]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  Paul D. Shaw,et al.  Using Tablet for visual exploration of second-generation sequencing data , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[30]  P. Beier,et al.  Influence of separating home range and dispersal movements on characterizing corridors and effective distances , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  Paul Beier,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance from habitat suitability: effects of data source and nonlinearities , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[33]  Vincent Calcagno,et al.  glmulti: An R Package for Easy Automated Model Selection with (Generalized) Linear Models , 2010 .

[34]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[35]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Veronica A. J. Doerr,et al.  Connectivity, dispersal behaviour and conservation under climate change: A response to Hodgson et al. , 2011 .

[37]  Paul Beier,et al.  Response to agriculture by a woodland species depends on cover type and behavioural state: insights from resident and dispersing Iberian lynx , 2016 .

[38]  J. Savage.  The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica, A Herpetofauna between Two Continents, between Two Seas. , 2002 .

[39]  J. Hadfield,et al.  Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[40]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Linking movement behavior and fine-scale genetic structure to model landscape connectivity for bobcats (Lynx rufus) , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Ecological resistance surfaces predict fine‐scale genetic differentiation in a terrestrial woodland salamander , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[42]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least‐cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? , 2011 .

[43]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Land cover dynamics following a deforestation ban in northern Costa Rica , 2013 .

[44]  B. Brenig,et al.  X-and Y-chromosome specific variants of the amelogenin gene allow sex determination in sheep ( Ovis aries ) and European red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) , 2005 .

[45]  J. Koprowski.  Handling tree squirrels with a safe and efficient restraint , 2002 .

[46]  Kamaljit S. Bawa,et al.  La Selva: ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. , 1995 .

[47]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[48]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to dispersal , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  C. Zambrana‐Torrelio,et al.  A time-calibrated species-level phylogeny of bats (Chiroptera, Mammalia) , 2011, PLoS currents.

[50]  Aaron Moody,et al.  Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[52]  Eduardo M. Venticinque,et al.  Kinship and Social Behavior of Lowland Tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) in a Central Amazon Landscape , 2014, PloS one.

[53]  O. Ronce.  How Does It Feel to Be Like a Rolling Stone? Ten Questions About Dispersal Evolution , 2007 .