The centrifugal horizontal cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly, Phaenicia sericata

Abstract Intracellular recordings combined with iontophoretic injection of Procion Yellow M4RAN were used to study the anatomy and physiology of the centrifugal horizontal cells (CH-cells) in the lobula plate of the blowfly, Phaenicia sericata. Anatomy: The CH-cells comprise a set of two homolateral, giant visual interneurones (DCH, VCH) at the rostral surface of each lobula plate. Their extensive arborizations in the lobula plate possess bulbous swellings (boutons terminaux). The arborization of one cell (DCH) covers the dorsal, and the arborization of the other cell (VCH) the ventral half of the lobula plate. Their axons run jointly with those of the horizontal cells through the chiasma internum and the optic peduncle. Their protocerebral arborization possesses spines; they form a dense network together with the axonal arborization of the horizontal cells, a second type of giant homolateral cell most sensitive to horizontal motion. The protocerebral arborization of the CH-cells gives rise to a cell body fibre which traverses the protocerebrum dorsally to the oesophageal canal. The cell body lies on the contralateral side laterally and slightly dorsally to the oesophageal canal in the frontal cell body layer. Physiology: The CH-cells respond with graded potentials to rotatory movements of their surround. Cells in the right lobula plate respond with excitation (excitatory postsynaptic potentials, membrane depolarization) to clockwise motion (contralateral regressive, ipsilateral progressive), and with inhibition (inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, membrane hyperpolarization) to counterclockwise motion in either or both receptive fields; CH-cells respond to motion presented to the ipsilateral and/or contralateral eye. Cells of the left lobula plate respond correspondingly to the reverse directions of motion. Vertical pattern motion and stationary patterns are ineffective. The heterolateral H1-neurone elicits excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the DCH-cell; these postsynaptic potentials are tightly correlated 1:1 to the preceding H1-action potential. The delay between the peak of the action potential and the beginning of the DCH-postsynaptic potential is 1.15 msec, agreeing very well with the value reported previously for the blowfly, Calliphora ( Hausen , 1976a). The synaptic input and output connections of the CH-cells are discussed.

[1]  R. Hengstenberg Spike responses of ‘non-spiking’ visual interneurone , 1977, Nature.

[2]  N. Strausfeld Mosaic Organizations, Layers, and Visual Pathways in the Insect Brain , 1976 .

[3]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Roland Hengstenberg,et al.  Intracellular Staining of Insect Neurons with Procion Yellow , 1980 .

[5]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[6]  K. Hausen Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[7]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part II. Towards the underlying neural interactions , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[8]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Columns and Layers in the Second Synaptic Region of the Fly’s Visual System: The Case for Two Superimposed Neuronal Architectures , 1972 .

[9]  Intensity and motion responses of giant vertical neurons of the fly eye. , 1980, Journal of neurobiology.

[10]  John Cedric Dill A computer-aided investigation of motion detection units in the fly , 1970 .

[11]  D. Keehn,et al.  Two Types of Neurones Sensitive to Motion in the Optic Lobe of the Fly , 1966, Nature.

[12]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Intensity, Form, and Motion Perception in the Visual Nervous Systems of Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica , 1969, The Journal of general physiology.