Context-dependent requirement of G protein coupling for Latrophilin-2 in target selection of hippocampal axons

The formation of neural circuits requires extensive interactions of cell-surface proteins to guide axons to their correct target neurons. Trans-cellular interactions of the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor latrophilin-2 (Lphn2) with its partner teneurin-3 instruct the precise assembly of hippocampal networks by reciprocal repulsion. Lphn2 acts as a receptor in distal CA1 neurons to direct their axons to proximal subiculum, and as a repulsive ligand in proximal subiculum to direct proximal CA1 axons to distal subiculum. It remains unclear if Lphn2-mediated intracellular signaling is required for its role in either context. Here, we show that Lphn2 couples to Gα12/13 in heterologous cells, which is increased by constitutive exposure of the tethered agonist. Specific mutations of Lphn2’s tethered agonist region disrupt its G protein coupling and autoproteolytic cleavage, whereas mutating the autoproteolytic cleavage site prevents cleavage but preserves a functional tethered agonist. Using an in vivo misexpression assay, we demonstrate that wild-type Lphn2 misdirects proximal CA1 axons to proximal subiculum and that Lphn2 tethered agonist activity is required for its role as a repulsive receptor. By contrast, neither tethered agonist activity nor autoproteolysis was necessary for Lphn2’s role as a repulsive ligand. Thus, tethered agonist activity is required for Lphn2-mediated neural circuit assembly in a context-dependent manner.

[1]  A. Kossiakoff,et al.  Isoform- and ligand-specific modulation of the adhesion GPCR ADGRL3/Latrophilin3 by a synthetic binder , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  Stachel-mediated activation of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: insights from cryo-EM studies , 2022, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[3]  M. J. Robertson,et al.  The tethered peptide activation mechanism of adhesion GPCRs , 2022, Nature.

[4]  Y. Li,et al.  Tethered peptide activation mechanism of the adhesion GPCRs ADGRG2 and ADGRG4 , 2022, Nature.

[5]  Qiang Zhao,et al.  Structural basis of tethered agonism of the adhesion GPCRs ADGRD1 and ADGRF1 , 2022, Nature.

[6]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  Structural basis for the tethered peptide activation of adhesion GPCRs , 2022, Nature.

[7]  Elizabeth D. Liu,et al.  Parahippocampal latrophilin-2 (ADGRL2) expression controls topographical presubiculum to entorhinal cortex circuit connectivity , 2021, Cell Reports.

[8]  T. Südhof,et al.  Latrophilin GPCR signaling mediates synapse formation , 2021, bioRxiv.

[9]  M. Sauer,et al.  Tethered agonist exposure in intact adhesion/class B2 GPCRs through intrinsic structural flexibility of the GAIN domain. , 2021, Molecular cell.

[10]  S. Quake,et al.  Reciprocal repulsions instruct the precise assembly of parallel hippocampal networks , 2021, Science.

[11]  F. Willard,et al.  A synthetic method to assay adhesion-family G-protein coupled receptors. Determination of the G-protein coupling profile of ADGRG6(GPR126). , 2020, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  G. Tall,et al.  Mechanisms of adhesion G protein–coupled receptor activation , 2020, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  D. McEwen,et al.  G12/13 is activated by acute tethered agonist exposure in the adhesion GPCR ADGRL3 , 2020, Nature Chemical Biology.

[14]  M. Chavent,et al.  Structural Basis of Teneurin-Latrophilin Interaction in Repulsive Guidance of Migrating Neurons , 2019, Cell.

[15]  Joshua A. Riback,et al.  Structural basis for adhesion G protein-coupled receptor Gpr126 function , 2019, Nature Communications.

[16]  F. Missirlis,et al.  Latrophilins: A Neuro-Centric View of an Evolutionary Conserved Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor Subfamily , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[17]  J. Bittencourt,et al.  Nomenclature and Comparative Morphology of the Teneurin/TCAP/ADGRL Protein Families , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[18]  T. Südhof,et al.  Latrophilin GPCRs direct synapse specificity by coincident binding of FLRTs and teneurins , 2019, Science.

[19]  A. Laquérriere,et al.  A de novo variant in ADGRL2 suggests a novel mechanism underlying the previously undescribed association of extreme microcephaly with severely reduced sulcation and rhombencephalosynapsis , 2018, Acta Neuropathologica Communications.

[20]  A. Heck,et al.  Association of Cell Adhesion Molecules Contactin-6 and Latrophilin-1 Regulates Neuronal Apoptosis , 2016, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[21]  A. Koide,et al.  Structural Basis for Regulation of GPR56/ADGRG1 by Its Alternatively Spliced Extracellular Domains , 2016, Neuron.

[22]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  The constitutive activity of the adhesion GPCR GPR114/ADGRG5 is mediated by its tethered agonist , 2016, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  Tethered Agonism: A Common Activation Mechanism of Adhesion GPCRs. , 2016, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.

[24]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  Adhesion G Protein-coupled Receptors , 2016, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology.

[25]  Lei Xu,et al.  Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors are activated by exposure of a cryptic tethered agonist , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  A tethered agonist within the ectodomain activates the adhesion G protein-coupled receptors GPR126 and GPR133. , 2014, Cell reports.

[27]  G. Gallo,et al.  Involvement of Rho-family GTPases in axon branching , 2014, Small GTPases.

[28]  J. Yates,et al.  FLRT Proteins Are Endogenous Latrophilin Ligands and Regulate Excitatory Synapse Development , 2012, Neuron.

[29]  T. Südhof,et al.  High Affinity Neurexin Binding to Cell Adhesion G-protein-coupled Receptor CIRL1/Latrophilin-1 Produces an Intercellular Adhesion Complex , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  T. Kozasa,et al.  Signalling mechanisms of RhoGTPase regulation by the heterotrimeric G proteins G12 and G13. , 2011, Journal of biochemistry.

[31]  M. Muenke,et al.  Screening of human LPHN3 for variants with a potential impact on ADHD susceptibility , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[32]  C. Freitag,et al.  A common variant of the latrophilin 3 gene, LPHN3, confers susceptibility to ADHD and predicts effectiveness of stimulant medication. , 2010, Molecular psychiatry.

[33]  N. Lambert,et al.  The c-terminus of GRK3 indicates rapid dissociation of G protein heterotrimers. , 2009, Cellular signalling.

[34]  R. Klein,et al.  Bidirectional Eph-ephrin signaling during axon guidance. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[35]  Liqun Luo,et al.  Actin cytoskeleton regulation in neuronal morphogenesis and structural plasticity. , 2002, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[36]  J G Flanagan,et al.  Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent. , 2000, Science.