Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement

Contribution: Student engagement and interest in engineering is compared between virtual and physical laboratory projects, designed to be realistic and replicate engineering practice. Reported motivation and engagement was greater in the virtual project than the physical projects. Results are interpreted in terms of the different affordances for instructional design using physical and virtual laboratories. Background: Interest is increasing in incorporating virtual laboratories in engineering curricula. Numerous studies report equal or greater gains in students’ conceptual understanding in a virtual laboratory than a corresponding physical laboratory, but many researchers question if virtual laboratories can stimulate the same level of excitement for engineering as physical laboratories. Research Questions: Do students’ self-reports of interest in engineering depend on the instructional design afforded by the laboratory mode? How do instructional designs of virtual and physical laboratory projects relate to students’ perceptions of engagement, their contribution to the team, and the transfer of prior coursework to meet project objectives? Method: In a within-subjects design, 118 students’ interest and engagement in two physical laboratory projects and one of two virtual laboratory projects in a senior-year capstone course is investigated. Separate principal components analyses were used to develop reliable scales for interest and for engagement. Findings: Students reported greater engagement, perceptions of contribution to their group’s learning, opportunities to transfer prior learning from coursework, and end-of-course interest in engineering problem solving in the virtual laboratory project rather than the physical laboratory projects. The positive outcomes are connected to instructional design through the affordances of the virtual laboratory.

[1]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[2]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Being adolescent : conflict and growth in the teenage years , 1984 .

[3]  Susan Bobbitt Nolen,et al.  Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science , 2003 .

[4]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[5]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Learning on the Job: A Situated Account of Teacher Learning in High School Mathematics Departments , 2005 .

[6]  Gregory L. Waddoups,et al.  The "Virtual ChemLab" Project: A Realistic and Sophisticated Simulation of Organic Synthesis and Organic Qualitative Analysis , 2005 .

[7]  S. B. Nolen,et al.  Situating Motivation , 2015 .

[8]  T. Jong,et al.  Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab , 2013 .

[9]  Tomi Jaakkola,et al.  A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation‐laboratory contexts , 2011 .

[10]  Mohammad Reza Farrokhnia,et al.  A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory , 2010 .

[11]  Milo Koretsky,et al.  Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories , 2011 .

[12]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[13]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .

[14]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Predictors and Consequences of Achievement Goals in the College Classroom: Maintaining Interest and Making the Grade , 1997 .

[15]  Pratim Sengupta,et al.  Learning Electricity with NIELS: Thinking with Electrons and Thinking in Levels , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[16]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Interest and the quality of experience in classrooms , 1994 .

[17]  Wen Hua Chang,et al.  A Comparison of Students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation‐Based and Microcomputer‐Based Laboratories , 2014 .

[18]  Euan Lindsay,et al.  Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[19]  Rod Sims,et al.  Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access , 2011, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[20]  Erick J. Nefcy.  Models and Modeling in Capstone Physical and Virtual Laboratory Projects , 2016 .

[21]  John R. Bourne,et al.  The Effectiveness of Learning Simulations for Electronic Laboratories , 2002 .

[22]  M. F. Iskander.  Technology-based electromagnetic education , 2002 .

[23]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[24]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum , 2014 .

[25]  K. E. Barron,et al.  The Role of Achievement Goals in the Development of Interest: Reciprocal Relations Between Achievement Goals, Interest, and Performance , 2008 .

[26]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  Middle‐School Science Through Design‐Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction , 2008 .

[27]  Ben M. Chen,et al.  A web-based virtual laboratory on a frequency modulation experiment , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[28]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[29]  P. Beike.  The Competitive Ethos And Democratic Education , 2016 .

[30]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[31]  Shane Wilson,et al.  Using Game-Based Learning in Virtual Worlds to Teach Electronic and Electrical Engineering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[32]  Victoria Hand,et al.  From the Court to the Classroom: Opportunities for Engagement, Learning, and Identity in Basketball and Classroom Mathematics , 2008 .

[33]  Sho Kimura,et al.  Enhancement of Student Learning in Experimental Design Using a Virtual Laboratory , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[34]  Susan Bobbitt Nolen,et al.  Adolescents' theories of education. , 1985 .

[35]  Guido Makransky,et al.  Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Vincenzo Piuri,et al.  A simulation tool for virtual laboratory experiments in a WWW environment , 1999, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[37]  Costas S. Tzafestas,et al.  Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: comparative experimental evaluation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[38]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[39]  John R. Bourne,et al.  Virtual Engineering Laboratories: Design and Experiments , 1994 .

[40]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Beyond Breadth-Speed-Test , 2013 .

[41]  Christian Gütl,et al.  Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Noah S. Podolefsky.  Learning science through computer games and simulations , 2012 .

[43]  Ingvar Gustavsson,et al.  Virtual Instrument Systems in Reality (VISIR) for Remote Wiring and Measurement of Electronic Circuits on Breadboard , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.