Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design

Abstract Developing students’ creative problem solving (CPS) is widely considered to be an important goal in engineering design education. However, the cognitive processes required for CPS are not currently well understood, limiting educators’ capacity to support this ability in students. This study used three cognitive abilities: divergent thinking, working memory, and relational reasoning to predict CPS in engineering design graduate students both before and after they learned to use the TRIZ ideation method. TRIZ, a Russian acronym meaning Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, is a method for improving the originality of the designs that engineers generate. In this study, relational reasoning is conceptualized as a construct encompassing analogical, anomalous, antinomous, and antithetical reasoning. In this study, master’s level engineering design students were given a creative design task before and after they were instructed on the TRIZ method. Then, their performance before and after instruction was compared. Using paired sample t-tests, it was found that participants produced significantly fewer design ideas after TRIZ instruction than they had before. But, TRIZ informed designs were significantly more original than those produced before. In a sequence of linear regression models, relational reasoning was found to be the strongest predictor of the originality of designs both before and after TRIZ instruction. Antinomous reasoning in particular was implicated in the production of original designs using TRIZ.

[1]  Zita Zoltay Paprika,et al.  Assessment of Creativity on the Job Market , 2012 .

[2]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation , 2012 .

[3]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Understanding Fluency and Originality: A latent variable perspective , 2014 .

[4]  David Passig,et al.  Measuring the style of innovative thinking among engineering students , 2014 .

[5]  L. Hudson Frames of Mind: Ability, Perception and Self-Perception in the Arts and Sciences , 1968 .

[6]  D. Klahr,et al.  The psychology of scientific discovery: Search in two problem Spaces , 1988 .

[7]  Hisataka Noguchi An idea generation support system for industrial designers (idea sketch processor) , 1997, Knowl. Based Syst..

[8]  John Merrill,et al.  Assessing Creativity Specific to Engineering with the Revised Creative Engineering Design Assessment , 2011 .

[9]  Alberto Bellocchi,et al.  Investigating and Theorizing Discourse during Analogy Writing in Chemistry. , 2011 .

[10]  Ulysses S. Grant,et al.  State of the Union Address , 2003 .

[11]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  The Impact of Analogies on Creative Concept Generation: Lessons From an In Vivo Study in Engineering Design , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[13]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Applied Tests of Design Skills—Part II: Visual Thinking , 2013 .

[14]  P. Alexander,et al.  Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century , 2012 .

[15]  Timothy C. Papadopoulos,et al.  Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers , 2012 .

[16]  James H. Cross,et al.  Reverse engineering and design recovery: a taxonomy , 1990, IEEE Software.

[17]  O. Vartanian,et al.  Working memory training is associated with lower prefrontal cortex activation in a divergent thinking task , 2013, Neuroscience.

[18]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  A content account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[19]  Rob Stone,et al.  Evaluating TRIZ as a Provider of Provocative Stimuli , 2012 .

[20]  E. Vogel,et al.  Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  K. Holyoak Analogy and Relational Reasoning , 2012 .

[22]  Frederick J. Gravetter,et al.  Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1991 .

[23]  Judith Schweppe,et al.  Attention, Working Memory, and Long-Term Memory in Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Perspective Based on Process Models of Working Memory , 2014 .

[24]  Maurie Caitlin Kelly,et al.  Government Printing Office expands database access , 1995 .

[25]  Davide Russo,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of patents and search for TRIZ contradictions , 2007 .

[26]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests Using Total Ideational Output and a Creativity Index , 1992 .

[27]  W. Gordon Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity , 1961 .

[28]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 1972 .

[29]  R. Sternberg The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills , 2006 .

[30]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Guiding creative talent , 1962 .

[31]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Strategies for success: uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning , 2013 .

[32]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Design Ideation Using TRIZ , 2006 .

[33]  Ian M. McDonough,et al.  Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs , 2010 .

[34]  Ivana Bianchi,et al.  Dimensions and their poles: A metric and topological approach to opposites , 2011 .

[35]  P. Johnson-Laird Analogy and the exercise of creativity , 1989 .

[36]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. , 2011 .

[37]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence Revisited: A Latent Variable Analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965) , 2008 .

[38]  D. Hocevar,et al.  Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. , 1979 .

[39]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Carla M. Firetto,et al.  Measuring Relational Reasoning , 2016 .

[41]  Sanz De Acedo Lizarraga Maria Luisa,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS ANALOGY AND CREATIVITY IN OPEN PROBLEM-SOLVING , 2011 .

[42]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[43]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Creating patents on the new technology using analogy-based patent mining , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Darrell Mann,et al.  An Introduction to TRIZ: The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 2001 .

[45]  Susan Bell Trickett,et al.  How Do Scientists Respond to Anomalies? Different Strategies Used in Basic and Applied Science , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Marcia Gentry,et al.  Hyperactive Disorder : Lifting the Mask Creativity and Working Memory in Gifted Students With and Without Characteristics of Attention Deficit , 2013 .

[47]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[48]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 1996 .

[49]  Brad Hokanson,et al.  By Measure: Creativity in Design , 2007 .

[50]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Assessment of Creativity , 2010, Creativity.

[51]  Lisa M. Baker,et al.  Relational reasoning in medical education: Patterns in discourse and diagnosis. , 2014 .

[52]  Bonnie Cramond,et al.  Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as Predictors of Personal and Public Achievement: A Fifty-Year Follow-Up , 2010 .

[53]  Suzanne H. Broughton,et al.  Bridging Reading Comprehension and Conceptual Change in Science Education: The Promise of Refutation Text , 2011 .

[54]  Noe Vargas Hernandez,et al.  Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ , 2012 .

[55]  David N. Rapp,et al.  Noticing and Revising Discrepancies as Texts Unfold , 2009 .

[56]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Päivi Korpelainen,et al.  Creativity and inspiration for problem solving in engineering education , 2011 .

[58]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Supporting Analogical Transfer in Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[59]  Denis Dumas,et al.  Relational reasoning as predictor for engineering ideation success using TRIZ , 2015 .

[60]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Individual Differences in Intelligence and Working Memory: A Review of Latent Variable Models , 2013 .

[61]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1999 .

[62]  D. Leach,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of TRIZ Creativity Training: An Organizational Field Study , 2012 .

[63]  Yasuyuki Taki,et al.  Failing to deactivate: The association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[64]  Marcia Gentry,et al.  Creativity and Working Memory in Gifted Students With and Without Characteristics of Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder , 2013 .

[65]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[66]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[67]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Applied Tests of Design Skills—Part 1: Divergent Thinking , 2012 .

[68]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Training working memory: Limits of transfer , 2013 .

[69]  P. Silvia,et al.  A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking , 2009 .

[70]  P. Alexander,et al.  Relational Reasoning and Its Manifestations in the Educational Context: a Systematic Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[71]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[72]  Mathias Benedek,et al.  Enhancement of Ideational Fluency by Means of Computer-Based Training , 2006 .

[73]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A methodology for supporting “transfer” in biomimetic design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[74]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.