Network model for the viscoelastic behavior of polymer nanocomposites

Abstract A theoretical network model reproducing some significant features of the viscoelastic behavior of unentangled polymer melts reinforced with well dispersed non-agglomerated nanoparticles is presented. Nanocomposites with low filler volume fraction (∼10%) and strong polymer–filler interactions are considered. The model is calibrated based on results obtained from discrete simulations of the equilibrium molecular structure of the material. This analysis provides the statistics of the network of chains connecting fillers, of dangling strands having one end adsorbed onto fillers, and that of the population of loops surrounding each nanoparticle. The network kinetics depends on the attachment–detachment dynamics of grafted chains of various types and is modeled by using a set of convection equations for the probability distribution functions. The overall viscoelastic response depends strongly on the lifetime of the polymer–filler junctions. The largest reinforcement is observed at low strain rates and low frequency oscillations. A solid like behavior is predicted for systems in which the polymer molecules interact strongly with the nanoparticles, effect which is associated with the behavior of the network of bridging segments.

[1]  D. F. Evans,et al.  Surface-induced enhancement of internal structure in polymers and proteins , 1990 .

[2]  T. Vilgis,et al.  On the Mechanism of Hydrodynamic Reinforcement in Elastic Composites , 2002 .

[3]  A. S. Lodge.  A network theory of flow birefringence and stress in concentrated polymer solutions , 1956 .

[4]  M. Denn,et al.  Constitutive equations based on the transient network concept , 1983 .

[5]  R. C. Picu,et al.  Structure of linear polymeric chains confined between impenetrable spherical walls , 2003 .

[6]  A. Isayev,et al.  A thermodynamic approach to the rheology of highly interactive filler-polymer mixtures: Part I – Theory , 2001 .

[7]  G. Marrucci,et al.  A model for the nonlinear rheology of associating polymers , 2000 .

[8]  P. Dorémus,et al.  Yield stress fluid. Structural model and transient shear flow behaviour , 1991 .

[9]  R. Bird.  Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids , 1977 .

[10]  A. I. Leonov,et al.  On the rheological modeling of filled polymers with particle-matrix interactions , 1995 .

[11]  A. Medalia.  Morphology of aggregates: VI. Effective volume of aggregates of carbon black from electron microscopy; Application to vehicle absorption and to die swell of filled rubber , 1970 .

[12]  A. Leonov.  On the rheology of filled polymers , 1990 .

[13]  J. Palierne.  Sticky dumbbells: from Hookean dumbbells to transient network , 1997 .

[14]  G. J. Fleer,et al.  Polymers at Interfaces , 1993 .

[15]  D. Kee,et al.  Rheological properties of structured fluids , 1994 .

[16]  A. Isayev,et al.  A thermodynamic approach to the rheology of highly interactive filler-polymer mixtures. Part II. Comparison with polystyrene/nanosilica mixtures , 2003 .

[17]  Lynden A. Archer,et al.  Poly(ethylene oxide)/Silica Nanocomposites: Structure and Rheology , 2002 .

[18]  A. B. Metzner.  Rheology of Suspensions in Polymeric Liquids , 1985 .

[19]  M. Graham,et al.  A model for slip at polymer/solid interfaces , 1998 .

[20]  P. Cassagnau,et al.  Non-linear viscoelastic behaviour and modulus recovery in silica filled polymers , 2003 .

[21]  F. Lequeux,et al.  Influence of the Glass Transition Temperature Gradient on the Nonlinear Viscoelastic Behavior in Reinforced Elastomers , 2003 .

[22]  R. C. Picu,et al.  Structure of polymers in the vicinity of convex impenetrable surfaces: the athermal case , 2002 .

[23]  J. Brady,et al.  The rheology of Brownian suspensions , 1989 .

[24]  J. Piau,et al.  Shear elasticity and yield stress of silica–silicone physical gels: Fractal approach , 1999 .

[25]  Gert Heinrich,et al.  Recent Advances in the Theory of Filler Networking in Elastomers , 2002 .

[26]  Thomas A. Vilgis,et al.  Reinforcement of Elastomers , 2002 .

[27]  P. Gennes,et al.  Slippage of an entangled polymer melt on a grafted surface , 1994 .

[28]  S. S. Sternstein,et al.  Reinforcement Mechanism of Nanofilled Polymer Melts As Elucidated by Nonlinear Viscoelastic Behavior , 2002 .

[29]  A. I. Leonov,et al.  On the theory of the adhesive friction of elastomers , 1986 .

[30]  R. Tanner,et al.  A new constitutive equation derived from network theory , 1977 .

[31]  Meng-jiao Wang.  Effect of Polymer-Filler and Filler-Filler Interactions on Dynamic Properties of Filled Vulcanizates , 1998 .

[32]  Andrzej Kloczkowski,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations on reinforcement of an elastomer by oriented prolate particles , 2001 .

[33]  J. Leblanc.  A molecular explanation for the origin of bound rubber in carbon black filled rubber compounds , 1997 .

[34]  G. Beaucage,et al.  Rational design of reinforced rubber , 2002 .

[35]  N. Kalogerakis,et al.  A dynamic slip velocity model for molten polymers based on a network kinetic theory , 1994 .

[36]  C. Macosko,et al.  Effect of reinforcing fillers on the rheology of polymer melts , 1992 .

[37]  P. Mele,et al.  A Molecular dynamics study of a model nanoparticle embedded in a polymer matrix , 2003 .