A state-based, proportional myoelectric control method: online validation and comparison with the clinical state-of-the-art

BackgroundCurrent clinical myoelectric systems provide unnatural prosthesis control, with limited functionality. In this study, we propose a proportional state-based control method, which allows switching between functions in a more natural and intuitive way than the traditional co-contraction switch method.MethodsWe validated the ability of the proposed system to provide precise control in both position and velocity modes. Two tests were performed with online visual feedback, involving target reaching and direct force control in grasping. The performance of the system was evaluated both on a subject with limb deficiency and in 9 intact-limbed subjects, controlling two degrees of freedom (DoF) of the hand and wrist.ResultsThe system allowed completion of the tasks involving 1-DoF with task completion rate >96% and of those involving 2-DoF with completion rate >91%. When compared with the clinical/industrial state-of-the-art approach and with a classic pattern recognition approach, the proposed method significantly improved the performance in the 2-DoF tasks. The completion rate in grasping force control was >97% on average.ConclusionsThese results indicate that, using the proposed system, subjects were successfully able to operate two DoFs, and to achieve precise force control in grasping. Thus, the proposed state-based method could be a suitable alternative for commercial myoelectric devices, providing reliable and intuitive control of two DoFs.

[1]  E L Morin,et al.  Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Suzanne B. Finucane,et al.  TRAINING INDIVIDUALS TO USE PATTERN RECOGNITION TO CONTROL AN UPPER LIMB PROSTHESIS , 2011 .

[5]  R. Scott,et al.  Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1986, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  Intuitive, Online, Simultaneous, and Proportional Myoelectric Control Over Two Degrees-of-Freedom in Upper Limb Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Continuous myoelectric control for powered prostheses using hidden Markov models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  K.B. Englehart,et al.  Multiple Binary Classifications via Linear Discriminant Analysis for Improved Controllability of a Powered Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Refined myoelectric control in below-elbow amputees using artificial neural networks and a data glove. , 2005, The Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[12]  Dario Farina,et al.  Is Accurate Mapping of EMG Signals on Kinematics Needed for Precise Online Myoelectric Control? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Dario Farina,et al.  Self-Correcting Pattern Recognition System of Surface EMG Signals for Upper Limb Prosthesis Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  A Decision-Based Velocity Ramp for Minimizing the Effect of Misclassifications During Real-Time Pattern Recognition Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  R N Scott,et al.  Myoelectric prostheses: state of the art. , 1988, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[17]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Confidence-Based Rejection for Improved Pattern Recognition Myoelectric Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of the training set on the accuracy of surface EMG classification in dynamic contractions for the control of multifunction prostheses , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[20]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[21]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Richard F. Weir,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Electrode Implantation and Targeting on Pattern Classification Accuracy for Prosthesis Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.