Influence in Social Media Marketing: A Quantitative Evaluation Framework from a Large Scale of Empirical Evidence

Social media creates a novel marketing mechanism to boost opinion formation and information diffusion. As a crucial idea, social influence sheds light on individuals' features in the process of communicating brand stories, and changes other consumers' opinions and behavior. Social media marketing has drawn great interests from scholars in a past decade, but the extant work neglects to establish an effectively quantitative evaluation framework that bridges the gap between the research findings and actual scenes. By scratching a large amount of empirical data, a set of taxonomy methods for extremely imbalanced examples in terms of statistics and relationship analysis have been proposed. The research performance reveals that the inequality social media distribution presents in multiaspects and multiple levels, and our study can precisely classify individuals having diverse social influence into different groups in which individuals possess common characteristics of social influence.

[1]  Ma. Luisa Rodríguez Sala de Gómezgil American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 72, núm. 3, noviembre 1966 , 1967 .

[2]  M. Haenlein,et al.  Managing Customer Relationships in the Social Media Era: Introducing the Social CRM House , 2013 .

[3]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[4]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[5]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[6]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[7]  Sangeeta Singh,et al.  Brand Performances in Social Media , 2012 .

[8]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[9]  Ron Shachar,et al.  Advertising and Consumers' Communications , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[10]  R. Burt Models of Network Structure , 1980 .

[11]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Locating privileged spreaders on an online social network. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[13]  Victoria D. Bush,et al.  What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2014 .

[14]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership , 2000 .

[16]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[17]  R. Goldsmith The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat, and What to Buy , 2004 .

[18]  F. Völckner,et al.  Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment , 2013 .

[19]  Alan Godoy,et al.  Social Network Analysis : A Survey of Research Applications in Computer Science , 2015 .

[20]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[21]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[22]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[23]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[25]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Directed closure measures for networks with reciprocity , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[26]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..