Online Data Collection From Gamblers: Methodological Issues

The paper outlines the advantages and disadvantages of using the Internet to collect data from gamblers, predominantly online gamblers. Drawing from experience of a number of studies carried out online by the authors and by reviewing the available literature, the authors discuss the main issues concerning data collected using computers and the Internet. The paper examines a number of areas including; recruiting and utilising participants, validity, suitable methods of data collection (i.e., questionnaire studies, online tests, participant observation, online interviews) and ethical issues. It is concluded that online research methods can be a useful way of examining the psychosocial aspects of online gambling and in some cases even traditional gambling activities.

[1]  George S. Howard,et al.  Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? , 1994 .

[2]  M. Davies,et al.  EverQuest—It’s Just a Computer Game Right? An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Online Gaming Addiction , 2006, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[3]  E. Husserl.  The Crises of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology , 1970 .

[4]  Richard T. A. Wood,et al.  The acquisition, development and maintenance of lottery and scratchcard gambling in adolescence. , 1998, Journal of adolescence.

[5]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[6]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Does Internet and Computer "Addiction" Exist? Some Case Study Evidence , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  B. Hølge-Hazelton.  The Internet: A New Field for Qualitative Inquiry? , 2002 .

[8]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Gender Swapping on the Internet , 1993 .

[9]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[10]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Demographic Factors and Playing Variables in Online Computer Gaming , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  The Structural Characteristics of Video Games: A Psycho-Structural Analysis , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  G. Neuman,et al.  Computerization of Paper-and-Pencil Tests: When are They Equivalent? , 1998 .

[13]  Nicole English,et al.  Prospects and Limitations of Psychological Testing on the Internet , 2002 .

[14]  M. Davies,et al.  Online computer gaming: a comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[15]  D. Dilalla.  Computerized Administration of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire , 1996 .

[16]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Breaking the Stereotype: The Case of Online Gaming , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Excessive online computer gaming: implications for education , 2002, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

[18]  G. Gilbert,et al.  Researching Social Life , 1994 .

[19]  N. Petry,et al.  Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: a focus on Internet gambling. , 2002, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[20]  J. Derevensky,et al.  Adolescent Gambling Behavior: A Prevalence Study and Examination of the Correlates Associated with Problem Gambling , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[21]  Christopher J. Cowton,et al.  The E-Interview , 2002 .

[22]  Richard T. A. Wood,et al.  Adolescent lottery and scratchcard players: do their attitudes influence their gambling behaviour? , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[23]  D S Rohlman,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological and Neurobehavioral Tests Self-Administered by Computer , 1999, Assessment.

[24]  E. Husserl,et al.  The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy , 1936 .

[25]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Can playing poker be good for you? Poker as a transferable skill , 2005 .