Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: A comparison of six major psychiatry journals.

In this study we investigated the characteristics of psychiatry manuscript that influence its citation rate. We conducted a cross-sectional study of published articles (n = 545), from January to June 2007, from 6 major psychiatry journals with the highest 5-year impact-factor. Citation count for these articles was retrieved from Web Of Science (by Clarivate Analytics) and 22 article characteristics were tabulated manually. We then predicted the citation rate by performing univariate analysis, spearman rank-order correlation, and multiple regression model on the collected variables. Using spearman rank-order correlation, we found the following variables to have significant positive correlation with citations: abstract character count (rs and p-value, 0.22 and 0.001 respectively), number of references (0.2, 0.01), abstract word count (0.17, 0.0005), number of pages (0.15, 0.003), open access (0.06, 0.05), study design reported in title (0.04, 0.0001), total number of words (0.03, 0.01) and structured abstract (0.03, 0.0009). In a multivariate linear regression model, the following variables predicted increased citation rates (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.38): reporting of study design in title, structured abstract and open access. Editors and authors of psychiatry journals can improve the impact of their journals and articles by utilizing this bibliometric study when assembling their manuscript.

[1]  P. Morgan International committee of medical journal editors. , 1983, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[2]  M. Khan,et al.  Characteristics of Highly Cited Articles in Interventional Cardiology. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  Van C. Lansingh,et al.  Does open access in ophthalmology affect how articles are subsequently cited in research? , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Haris N. Shekhani,et al.  Bibliometric Analysis of Manuscript Characteristics That Influence Citations: A Comparison of Six Major Radiology Journals. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences , 2005, JAMA.

[6]  Xiyan Zhao,et al.  Worldwide research productivity in the field of psychiatry , 2017, International Journal of Mental Health Systems.

[7]  Fuyuki Yoshikane,et al.  Factors affecting citation rates of research articles , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Michael N. Mavros,et al.  The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Richard A. Goodman,et al.  What's in a Title? A Descriptive Study of Article Titles in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals , 2001 .

[10]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Bibliometric Analysis of Human Factors (1970-2000): A Quantitative Description of Scientific Impact , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[11]  M. Zeshan,et al.  Child psychiatry: A scientometric analysis 1980-2016 , 2017, F1000Research.

[12]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered , 1985, Scientometrics.

[13]  Z. Duan,et al.  Analysis on evolution and research focus in psychiatry field , 2015, BMC Psychiatry.

[14]  J. PérezMartín,et al.  [International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2008, Revista alergia Mexico.

[15]  A. Harlev,et al.  Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics , 2016, Asian journal of andrology.

[16]  Mark Ware,et al.  The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing fourth edition , 2015 .

[17]  D. Aksnes CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS , 2003 .

[18]  G. Antoniou,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. , 2015, Annals of vascular surgery.