The use of contact heat evoked potential stimulator (CHEPS) in magnetoencephalography for pain research

BACKGROUND Contact heat evoked potentials (CHEP) is a thermal stimulus modality used in pain research. We examine a commercial CHEP stimulator (CHEPS) that is designed to work in an fMRI environment, but poorly understood in the MEG environment. The CHEPS attains target temperatures rapidly using sophisticated control signals that unfortunately induce artifacts in the MEG. In this paper, we summarize our experiences using the CHEPS in MEG to study pain using an experimental paradigm, and propose a novel method for managing its artifact. NEW METHOD We introduce a novel damped sinusoid modeling (DSM) technique to remove the CHEPS artifact based on estimates of the underlying sinusoids and damping factors. We show comparisons to signal space projection (SSP) and temporal signal space separation (tSSS) methods. RESULTS The CHEPS artifact is highly dynamic, yet deterministic, switching rapidly from one frequency to another, with different spatial components. The galvanic connection between the subject and the CHEPS probe alters its performance, making pre-characterization difficult. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS SSP methods failed to remove the artifact completely. TSSS performed better than SSP; however, tSSS requires the use of a multipolar head model that decreases the dimensionality and possibly the information content of the data. In contrast, DSM offers a strictly temporal modeling approach in which the artifact is estimated as a sum of damped sinusoids which is subtracted from the data. CONCLUSION Though the CHEPS increases the noise floor and introduces artifacts to the data, we believe the device can be successfully used in MEG if appropriate artifact removal techniques are followed.

[1]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Jaakko O. Nieminen,et al.  Polarization encoding as a novel approach to MRI. , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[3]  A. Hobson,et al.  Central nervous system processing of human visceral pain in health and disease. , 2003, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[4]  P. Mitra,et al.  Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[5]  K. Ikramov Matrix pencils: Theory, applications, and numerical methods , 1993 .

[6]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency? , 2008, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[7]  P. Rossini,et al.  Cortical alpha rhythms are related to the anticipation of sensorimotor interaction between painful stimuli and movements: a high-resolution EEG study. , 2008, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[8]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  Matrix pencil method for estimating parameters of exponentially damped/undamped sinusoids in noise , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[9]  R. Treede,et al.  Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease , 2005, European journal of pain.

[10]  Katja Wiech,et al.  Anticipatory brainstem activity predicts neural processing of pain in humans , 2007, Pain.

[11]  K. Arun,et al.  State-space and singular-value decomposition-based approximation methods for the harmonic retrieval problem , 1983 .

[12]  R. Melzack Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. , 2001, Journal of dental education.

[13]  Gerd Kobal,et al.  Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation , 1985, Pain.

[14]  A. Apkarian,et al.  Cortical representation of pain: functional characterization of nociceptive areas near the lateral sulcus , 2000, Pain.

[15]  P L Volegov,et al.  Ultra-low field NMR measurements of liquids and gases with short relaxation times. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[16]  S. Vanhuffel,et al.  Algorithm for time-domain NMR data fitting based on total least squares , 1994 .

[17]  D. van Ormondt,et al.  Improved algorithm for noniterative time-domain model fitting to exponentially damped magnetic resonance signals , 1987 .

[18]  H. Stefan,et al.  Pain-Related Somatosensory Evoked Magnetic Fields Induced by Controlled Ballistic Mechanical Impacts , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[19]  A. Engel,et al.  Attention to Painful Stimulation Enhances γ-Band Activity and Synchronization in Human Sensorimotor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Andrew C. N. Chen,et al.  Lasers and other thermal stimulators for activation of skin nociceptors in humans , 2003, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  A. Engel,et al.  Duration of the cue-to-pain delay increases pain intensity: a combined EEG and MEG study , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[23]  Joachim Gross,et al.  The effect of filtering on Granger causality based multivariate causality measures , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[25]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  S.M. Kay,et al.  Spectrum analysis—A modern perspective , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal‐space separation: Demonstration with single‐trial auditory‐evoked responses , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[29]  Joachim Gross,et al.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research , 2013, NeuroImage.

[30]  G. R. Barnes,et al.  Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Journal of Neuroscience Methods Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: JNEUMETH-D-07-00538R1 Title: Effective electromagnetic noise cancellation with beamformers and synthetic gradiometry in shielded and partly-shielded environments , 2008 .