The Influence of Network Governance Factors on Success in Open Source Software Development Projects

The phenomenon of open source software has lately caught the attention of both the popular press and many researchers in such diverse fields as MIS, computer science, sociology, and management. The organizational challenges faced by open source development projects are significant, because a project must deal with the complexity of coordinating the efforts of a geographically distributed base of volunteers to create a working software product. Based on a theoretical framework of network governance, the influence of social mechanisms on the coordination and safeguarding of exchanges among project members, and how these influence project success are examined. Using survey and objective data, 38 open source projects are empirically investigated to test a formal path model of network governance in open source projects. The model of network governance provides a good explanation of how governance mechanisms can influence success in open source projects, namely, restricted access to the development team improves coordination within the project and safeguards exchanges among project members. Further, collective sanctions safeguard exchanges among project members, and the importance of reputation to project members aids in managing conflicts within the project. Finally, better coordination allows a project to be more successful, while safeguarding exchanges does not appear to impact project success.

[1]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Reengineering the Systems Development Process: The Link Between Autonomous Teams and Business Process Outcomes , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Chris DiBona,et al.  Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution , 1999 .

[3]  O. Williamson.  Opportunism and its critics , 1993 .

[4]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Software Development: Processes and Performance , 1998, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Defining Open Source Software Project Success , 2003, ICIS.

[6]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  A Social Analysis of Software Development Teams: Three Models and their Differences , 2000 .

[7]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[8]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[9]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions , 1974 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[12]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[13]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[14]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[16]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[17]  Gerda Gemser,et al.  Effects of Reputational Sanctions on the Competitive Imitation of Design Innovations , 2001 .

[18]  O. Williamson.  Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory , 1993 .

[19]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory , 1996 .

[20]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[21]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[22]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[23]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[26]  T. L. Schwartz.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .