Rapid Neural Adaptation to Sound Level Statistics

Auditory neurons must represent accurately a wide range of sound levels using firing rates that vary over a far narrower range of levels. Recently, we demonstrated that this “dynamic range problem” is lessened by neural adaptation, whereby neurons adjust their input–output functions for sound level according to the prevailing distribution of levels. These adjustments in input–output functions increase the accuracy with which levels around those occurring most commonly are coded by the neural population. Here, we examine how quickly this adaptation occurs. We recorded from single neurons in the auditory midbrain during a stimulus that switched repeatedly between two distributions of sound levels differing in mean level. The high-resolution analysis afforded by this stimulus showed that a prominent component of the adaptation occurs rapidly, with an average time constant across neurons of 160 ms after an increase in mean level, much faster than our previous experiments were able to assess. This time course appears to be independent of both the timescale over which sound levels varied and that over which sound level distributions varied, but is related to neural characteristic frequency. We find that adaptation to an increase in mean level occurs more rapidly than to a decrease. Finally, we observe an additional, slow adaptation in some neurons, which occurs over a timescale of tens of seconds. Our findings provide constraints in the search for mechanisms underlying adaptation to sound level. They also have functional implications for the role of adaptation in the representation of natural sounds.

[1]  E. D. Adrian,et al.  The Basis of Sensation , 1928, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[2]  P. Dallos,et al.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex , 1982, Nature.

[4]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[5]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid adaptation depends on the characteristic frequency of auditory nerve fibers , 1985, Hearing Research.

[6]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Guinan,et al.  Medial efferent inhibition produces the largest equivalent attenuations at moderate to high sound levels in cat auditory-nerve fibers. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[9]  C. Stevens,et al.  Very short-term plasticity in hippocampal synapses. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Carandini,et al.  A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. , 1997, Science.

[11]  N. Suga,et al.  Corticofugal modulation of frequency processing in bat auditory system , 1997, Nature.

[12]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[13]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms of Long-Lasting Adaptation in Visual Cortical Neurons In Vitro , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Membrane Mechanisms Underlying Contrast Adaptation in Cat Area 17In Vivo , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code , 2001, Nature.

[16]  D. Oliver,et al.  Distinct K Currents Result in Physiologically Distinct Cell Types in the Inferior Colliculus of the Rat , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Nelson,et al.  Short-Term Depression at Thalamocortical Synapses Contributes to Rapid Adaptation of Cortical Sensory Responses In Vivo , 2002, Neuron.

[18]  M. Meister,et al.  Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry , 2002, Neuron.

[19]  A. Rees,et al.  Firing patterns of inferior colliculus neurons–histology and mechanism to change firing patterns in rat brain slices , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Andreas V. M. Herz,et al.  A Universal Model for Spike-Frequency Adaptation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[21]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Spike-frequency adaptation in the inferior colliculus. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  I. Nelken,et al.  Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  John P. Miller,et al.  Temporal encoding in nervous systems: A rigorous definition , 1995, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[24]  Donald A. Wilson,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Coordinate Synaptic Mechanisms Contributing to Olfactory Cortical Adaptation , 2022 .

[25]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Kelly,et al.  Contribution of AMPA, NMDA, and GABAA Receptors to Temporal Pattern of Postsynaptic Responses in the Inferior Colliculus of the Rat , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  M. Meister,et al.  Dynamic predictive coding by the retina , 2005, Nature.

[29]  I. Dean,et al.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Winer Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems , 2005, Hearing Research.

[31]  L. Maler,et al.  Spike-Frequency Adaptation Separates Transient Communication Signals from Background Oscillations , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  I. Winter,et al.  The time course of recovery from suppression and facilitation from single units in the mammalian cochlear nucleus , 2006, Hearing Research.

[33]  J. Guinan Olivocochlear Efferents: Anatomy, Physiology, Function, and the Measurement of Efferent Effects in Humans , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[34]  Katherine I. Nagel,et al.  Temporal Processing and Adaptation in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain , 2006, Neuron.

[35]  Tonotopic Distribution of Short-Term Adaptation Properties in the Cochlear Nerve of Normal and Acoustically Overexposed Chicks , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[36]  D. Contreras,et al.  Balanced Excitation and Inhibition Determine Spike Timing during Frequency Adaptation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Guinan,et al.  Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  A. Fairhall,et al.  Shifts in Coding Properties and Maintenance of Information Transmission during Adaptation in Barrel Cortex , 2007, PLoS biology.

[39]  A. J. King,et al.  The ferret auditory cortex: descending projections to the inferior colliculus. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Hubert H. Lim,et al.  Antidromic activation reveals tonotopically organized projections from primary auditory cortex to the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in guinea pig. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.