Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Using Average Gradient and Shape Based Feature

In medio-lateral oblique view of mammogram, pectoral muscle may sometimes affect the detection of breast cancer due to their similar characteristics with abnormal tissues. As a result pectoral muscle should be handled separately while detecting the breast cancer. In this paper, a novel approach for the detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient- and shape-based feature is proposed. The process first approximates the pectoral muscle boundary as a straight line using average gradient-, position-, and shape-based features of the pectoral muscle. Straight line is then tuned to a smooth curve which represents the pectoral margin more accurately. Finally, an enclosed region is generated which represents the pectoral muscle as a segmentation mask. The main advantage of the method is its’ simplicity as well as accuracy. The method is applied on 200 mammographic images consisting 80 randomly selected scanned film images from Mammographic Image Analysis Society (mini-MIAS) database, 80 direct radiography (DR) images, and 40 computed radiography (CR) images from local database. The performance is evaluated based upon the false positive (FP), false negative (FN) pixel percentage, and mean distance closest point (MDCP). Taking all the images into consideration, the average FP and FN pixel percentages are 4.22%, 3.93%, 18.81%, and 6.71%, 6.28%, 5.12% for mini-MIAS, DR, and CR images, respectively. Obtained MDCP values for the same set of database are 3.34, 3.33, and 10.41 respectively. The method is also compared with two well-known pectoral muscle detection techniques and in most of the cases, it outperforms the other two approaches.

[1]  Dev P. Chakraborty,et al.  Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Mariusz Bajger,et al.  Minimum Spanning Trees and Active Contours for Identification of the Pectoral Muscle in Screening Mammograms , 2005, Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA'05).

[3]  Yasuyo Kita,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Yianni Attikiouzel,et al.  Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  De Paredes,et al.  Atlas of mammography , 2007 .

[6]  Xin Yuan,et al.  Automatic pectoral muscle boundary detection in mammograms based on Markov chain and active contour model , 2009, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C.

[7]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Radon-Domain Detection of the Nipple and the Pectoral Muscle in Mammograms , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Mariusz Bajger,et al.  Two graph theory based methods for identifying the pectoral muscle in mammograms , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  P. Undrill,et al.  The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Heather W. Pearlman CLINICAL BREAST IMAGING: A PATIENT FOCUSED TEACHING FILE, Gilda Cardenosa (Ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA (2007), 528 pp, more than 800 images, $129.00, hardcover , 2008 .

[12]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Development of an automated method for detecting mammographic masses with a partial loss of region , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.