Enhancing the control of force in putting by video game training

Even if golf video games provide no proprioceptive afferences on actual putting movement, they may give sufficient substitutive visual cues to enhance force control in this skill. It was hypothesized that this usefulness requires, however, two conditions: the video game must provide reliable demonstrations of actual putts, and the user must want to use the game to make progress in actual putting. Accordingly, a video game was selected on the basis of its fidelity to the real-world game. It allowed two different methods of adjusting the virtual player's putting force in order to hole a putt: an analogue method that consisted of focusing on the virtual player's movement and a symbolic method that consisted of focusing on the movement of a gauge on a scale representing the virtual player's putting force. The participants had to use one of these methods with either the intention of making progress in actual putting or in a second condition to simply enjoy the game. Results showed a positive transfer of video playing to actual putting skill for the learning group and also, to a lesser degree, for the enjoyment group; but only when they used the symbolic method. Results are discussed in the context of how vision may convey force cues in sports video games.

[1]  H. T. A. Whiting,et al.  The Effect of the Availability of a Dynamic Model on the Acquisition of a Complex Cyclical Action , 1987 .

[3]  J. R. Thomas,et al.  Relation of knowledge and performance in boys' tennis: age and expertise. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  J. Lishman,et al.  The Autonomy of Visual Kinaesthesis , 1973, Perception.

[5]  Donna L. Pastore,et al.  Effects of Occluded Vision and Imagery on Putting Golf Balls , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Simulator Design and Instructional features for Air-to-Ground Attack: Transfer Study , 1986 .

[7]  J. Bright,et al.  Differences between implicit and explicit acquisition of a complex motor skill under pressure: an examination of some evidence. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[8]  K. J. Cole.  Grasp force control in older adults. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  A. Coelho,et al.  Chapter 8 The Perceptual Side of Action:Decision-Making in Sport , 1993 .

[10]  R. Jagacinski,et al.  Tempo, Rhythm, and Aging in Golf. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  M. Jeannerod.  The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Janet L. Starkes,et al.  Can We Hasten Expertise by Video Simulations , 1994 .

[13]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Interpretation of perceived motor commands by reference to afferent signals. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  V. Nougier,et al.  Movement control in golf putting , 1997 .

[15]  A Bandura,et al.  The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: making the unobservable observable. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  R. Masters.  Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure , 1992 .

[17]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[18]  W. J. Robinson,et al.  The effects of skill level on EMG activity during internal and external imagery , 1986 .

[19]  R. S. Kennedy,et al.  Communality of Videogame Performances with Tracking Tasks , 1991, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  Anne R. Isaac,et al.  An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). , 1986 .

[21]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  C. Bard,et al.  Weight judgment. The discrimination capacity of a deafferented subject. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Gerard J. Blaauw,et al.  Driving Experience and Task Demands in Simulator and Instrumented Car: A Validation Study , 1982 .

[24]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Simulator Design and Instructional Features for Air-to-Ground Attack: A Transfer Study , 1989 .

[25]  Michel Cabanac,et al.  Pleasure as a Sign of Efficacy of Mental Activity , 1997 .

[26]  Ulric Neisser,et al.  Observational Learning of Ballet Sequences: The Role of Kinematic Information , 1991 .

[27]  G Aksamit,et al.  Feedback Influences on the Skill of Putting , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  G. Bingham,et al.  Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Jeffrey A. Jordan,et al.  Visual attention: Individual differences in training and predicting complex task performance , 1995 .

[30]  E. Sedgwick,et al.  The perceptions of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Strategies for improving understanding of motor expertise [or mistakes we have made and things we have learned!!] , 1993 .

[32]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Topographical distribution of EEG activity accompanying visual and motor imagery in vivid and non-vivid imagers. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[33]  D. Burke,et al.  Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements , 1992 .

[34]  K. Davids,et al.  Declarative knowledge in sport: a by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? , 1995 .

[35]  Jeffrey S. Freeman.  THE IOWA DRIVING SIMULATOR : A TOOL FOR HUMAN FACTORS AND VEHICLE VIRTUAL PROTOTYPING RESEARCH , 1994 .

[36]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  The Transfer of Skill from a Computer Game Trainer to Actual Flight , 1992 .