Changes in morphology and physiology of an East Mediterranean sponge in different habitats

The sponge Tetilla sp. (Tetractinomorpha: Tetillidae) is a common species in the eastern Mediterranean. This sponge inhabits four different habitat types differing in wave impact and irradiance levels. Two of these habitats (a shallow cave and deep water) are characterized by relatively calm water, whereas the other two (shallow exposed site and tide pools) are in turbulent water with high energy flow. The present study examined the influence of physical (depth, illumination and water motion) and biotic factors on morphology, skeletal plasticity and reproductive traits among the four spatially separated populations. Sponges from tidal pools had significantly larger body volume than sponges from deep water and from shallow caves (ANOVA: tidal-deep P<0.0001; tidal-shallow caves P<0.05). Sponges from exposed habitats were significantly larger than deep-water sponges (ANOVA: P=0.01). In addition, individuals from tide pools and from the exposed habitat had a significantly higher proportion of structural silica than sponges from the calmer deep water and from the cave sites. Oxea spicules in sponges from the calm habitats were significantly shorter than in those from the tidal pools and the exposed habitats. The percentage of spicules out of a sponge’s dry weight in individuals transplanted from deep (calm) to shallow (turbulent) water significantly increased by 21.9±12.9%. The new spicule percentage did not differ significantly from that of sponges originally from shallow water. Oocyte diameter differed significantly between habitats. The maximal size of mature eggs was found in deep-water sponges in June (97±5 μm). In the shallow habitats, a smaller maximal oocyte diameter was found in the cave, in May (56.5±3 μm). Furthermore, oocyte density in shallow-water sponges was highest in May and decreased in June (with 88.2±9 and 19.3±9 oocytes mm−2, respectively). At the same time (June), oocyte density of deep-water sponges had just reached its maximum (155±33.7 oocytes mm−2). The difference in oocyte size and density between deep- and shallow-water individuals indicates an earlier gamete release in the shallow sponge population. The results suggest that plasticity in skeletal design of this sponge indicates a trade off between spicule production and investment in reproduction.

[1]  A. Hill,et al.  Morphological Plasticity in the Tropical Sponge Anthosigmella varians: Responses to Predators and Wave Energy , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[2]  G. Bavestrello,et al.  Influence of depth on the size of sponge spicules , 1993 .

[3]  R. Manconi,et al.  Morphotypes of Spongia officinalis (Demospongiae, Dictyoceratida) in two Mediterranean populations , 2003 .

[4]  W. G. Fry.  The biology of the porifera , 1971 .

[5]  D. Barthel,et al.  Silica uptake of the marine sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel Bight , 1997 .

[6]  K. McGuinness,et al.  Environmentally influenced variability in the morphology of Cinachyrella australiensis (Carter 1886) (Porifera: Spirophorida: Tetillidae) , 2002 .

[7]  M. Ilan,et al.  Life history characteristics of a coral reef sponge , 1995 .

[8]  S. Palumbi.  How body plans limit acclimation: responses of a demosponge to wave force , 1986 .

[9]  C. Dai,et al.  Reproductive ecology of the scleractinian coral Echinopora lamellosa in northern and southern Taiwan , 1995 .

[10]  D. Barnes,et al.  The importance of micro and macro morphological variation in the adaptation of a sublittoral demosponge to current extremes , 2002 .

[11]  D. Barthel,et al.  The reproductive cycle of the sponge Halichondria panicea Pallas (1766) and its relationship to temperature and salinity , 1994 .

[12]  P. Olive,et al.  Reproduction and reproductive variability in the coral Pocillopora verrucosa from the Republic of Maldives , 1994 .

[13]  M. Úriz,et al.  Patterns of resource allocation to somatic, defensive, and reproductive functions in the Mediterranean encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) , 1995 .

[14]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Sponge distribution across Davies Reef, Great Barrier Reef, relative to location, depth, and water movement , 2004, Coral Reefs.

[15]  M. Koehl.  MECHANICAL DESIGN OF SPICULE-REINFORCED CONNECTIVE TISSUE: STIFFNESS , 1982 .

[16]  J. Fromont.  Reproductive development and timing of tropical sponges (Order Haplosclerida) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia , 1994, Coral Reefs.

[17]  C. Dai,et al.  Reproductive plasticity in the reef coral Echinopora lamellosa , 1999 .

[18]  Y. Loya,et al.  Sexual reproduction and settlement of the coral reef spongeChalinula sp. from the Red Sea , 1990 .

[19]  S. Palumbi,et al.  Tactics of Acclimation: Morphological Changes of Sponges in an Unpredictable Environment , 1984, Science.

[20]  R. Paine.  Ash and Calorie Determinations of Sponge and Opisthobranch Tissues , 1964 .

[21]  D. Barnes,et al.  The influences of bathymetry and flow regime upon the morphology of sublittoral sponge communities , 2000, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[22]  Jaap A. Kaandorp,et al.  Morphological analysis of growth forms of branching marine sessile organisms along environmental gradients , 1999 .

[23]  B. Willis,et al.  Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef , 1986 .

[24]  M. Úriz,et al.  Trends in space occupation by the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe: variation in shape as a function of size and environment , 1994 .

[25]  S. Suttles,et al.  Gypsum dissolution is not a universal integrator of ‘water motion’ , 2000 .

[26]  L.,et al.  Water motion on coral reefs: evaluation of the 'clod card' technique , 2006 .

[27]  M. Doty.  Measurement of Water Movement in Reference to Benthic Algal Growth , 1971 .

[28]  R. Manconi,et al.  Life cycle of Spongilla lacustris (Porifera, Spongillidae): a cue for environment-dependent phenotype , 1991, Hydrobiologia.