Performance prediction methodology for biometric systems using a large deviations approach

In the selection of biometrics for use in a recognition system and in the subsequent design of the system, the predicted performance is a key consideration. The realizations of the biometric signatures or vectors of features extracted from the signatures can be modeled as realizations of random processes. These random processes and the resulting distributions on the measurements determine bounds on the performance, regardless of the implementation of the recognition system. Given the underlying random processes, two techniques are applied to determine performance bounds. First, large deviation analysis is applied to bound performance in (M+1)-ary hypothesis testing problems, where the number of hypotheses is fixed as a measure of the fidelity of the measurements increases. Second, the capacity of a recognition system as a function of the desired error rate is explored. The recognition system is directly analogous to a communication problem with random coding. The recognition reliability function then determines the error rate as a function of the exponential growth rate of the number of hypotheses. Gaussian and binary examples are considered in detail. Performance prediction in the binary example is compared with performance prediction results for iris recognition systems using Daugman's IrisCode.

[1]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  On the asymptotics of M-hypothesis Bayesian detection , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  Biometrics: Future of Identification , 2000 .

[3]  Ralph Gross,et al.  Appearance-based face recognition and light-fields , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Marcel W. Muller,et al.  Spatial noise phenomena of longitudinal magnetic recording media , 1992 .

[5]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  Biometrics: The Future of Identification - Guest Editors' Introduction , 2000, Computer.

[6]  James L. Wayman,et al.  Error rate equations for the general biometric system , 1999, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[7]  Michael S. Lew Next-Generation Web Searches for Visual Content , 2000, Computer.

[8]  John Daugman,et al.  Demodulation by Complex-Valued Wavelets for Stochastic Pattern Recognition , 2003, Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process..

[9]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  On-line fingerprint verification , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Ronald S. Indeck,et al.  Fingerprinting magnetic media , 1993 .

[11]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[13]  Natalia A. Schmid,et al.  Large deviations performance analysis for biomet-rics recognition , 2002 .

[14]  Volker Blanz,et al.  Component-Based Face Recognition with 3D Morphable Models , 2003, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[15]  R. Khanna,et al.  Evaluation of automated biometrics-based identification and verification systems , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  G. Parmigiani Large Deviation Techniques in Decision, Simulation and Estimation , 1992 .

[17]  John Daugman,et al.  High Confidence Visual Recognition of Persons by a Test of Statistical Independence , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  On the Individuality of Fingerprints , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  John Daugman,et al.  The importance of being random: statistical principles of iris recognition , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  Amir Dembo,et al.  Large Deviations Techniques and Applications , 1998 .

[21]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review , 2005, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory.

[22]  Arun Ross,et al.  Multibiometric systems , 2004, CACM.

[23]  J G Daugman,et al.  Demodulation, predictive coding, and spatial vision. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  Richard E. Blahut,et al.  Principles and practice of information theory , 1987 .

[25]  R. Gray Entropy and Information Theory , 1990, Springer New York.

[26]  Arun Ross,et al.  Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[27]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[28]  Natalia A. Schmid,et al.  Performance analysis of physical signature authentication , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[29]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  A Prototype Hand Geometry-based Verication System , 1999 .

[30]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Information-Theoretic Image Formation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.