The effects of unconsolidated sediments upon the ground motion during local earthquakes

abstract A vertical seismic array at the Richmond Field Station on the margin of San Francisco Bay, California, has provided some excellent experimental data showing the effects of unconsolidated sediments on ground motion during local earthquakes. The experiments are well controlled in that good estimates of the material properties of the sediments are available, with the largest uncertainty being in the attenuation. Three components of acceleration have been recorded in bedrock below the sediments, within the sediments, and at the surface of the sediments from two local earthquakes. The maximum accelerations at the surface are between 1.5 and 4.3 times those in the bedrock. Analytical calculations which assume vertically propagating waves and which are suitable for highly attenuating materials explain the major differences between the bedrock records and the surface records for both vertical and horizontal components. Maximum accelerations, duration, frequency content, general character of the records, and response spectra are all in approximate agreement. Some of the energy arriving late in the records can best be explained by surface waves propagating horizontally in the sediments.

[1]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Strong ground motion of the San Fernando, California, earthquake: Ground displacements , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Effects of ground on earthquake motion , 1957 .

[3]  A. G. Brady,et al.  Correlations of peak acceleration, velocity and displacement with earthquake magnitude, distance and site conditions , 1976 .

[4]  G. W. Housner,et al.  Calculation of surface motions of a layered half-space , 1970, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Influence of Soil Conditions on Ground Motions During Earthquakes , 1969 .

[6]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes , 1975 .

[8]  W. Silva Body waves in a layered anelastic solid , 1976 .

[9]  Seismic investigation of a san francisco bay mud site , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Seismic Response of Horizontal Soil Layers , 1968 .

[11]  J. Lysmer,et al.  Modification of seismograph records for effects of local soil conditions , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Analysis of seismograms from a downhole array in sediments near San Francisco Bay , 1976 .

[13]  W. Silva A Variational Formulation for Love Waves in a Layered Anelastic Solid , 1958 .

[14]  R. Borcherdt Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[15]  金井 淸 19. Relation between the Nature of Surface Layer and the Amplitude of Earthquake Motions. II. , 1952 .

[16]  B. Bolt,et al.  The Briones Hills earthquake swarm of January 8, 1977, Contra Costa County, California , 1977 .

[17]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Importance of Physical Dispersion in Surface Wave and Free Oscillation Problems: Review (Paper 6R0680) , 1977 .

[18]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Analyses of ground motions at Union Bay, Seattle during earthquakes and distant nuclear blasts , 1970, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Soil Dynamics: Behavior Including Liquefaction , 1976 .

[20]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  An analysis of ground motions during the 1957 San Francisco earthquake , 1968 .

[21]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Relationships of maximum acceleration, maximum velocity, distance from source, and local site conditions for moderately strong earthquakes , 1975 .

[22]  T. McEvilly,et al.  Shear wave velocities from down‐hole measurements , 1977 .

[23]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion , 1975 .