Systematic Differences in Aircraft and Radiosonde Temperatures

Automated aircraft data are very important as input to numerical weather prediction (NWP) models because of their accuracy, large quantity, and extensive and different data coverage compared to radiosonde data. On average, aircraft mean temperature observation increments [MTOI; defined here as the observations minus the corresponding 6-h forecast (background)] are more positive (warmer) than radiosondes, especially around jet level. Temperatures from different model types of aircraft exhibit a large variance in MTOI that vary with both pressure and the phase of flight (POF), confirmed by collocation studies. This paper compares temperatures of aircraft and radiosondes by collocation and MTOI differences, along with discussing the pros and cons of each method, with neither providing an absolute truth. Arguments are presented for estimating bias corrections of aircraft temperatures before input into NWP models based on the difference of their MTOI and that of radiosondes, which tends to cancel systematic er...

[2]  D. P. DEE,et al.  Bias and data assimilation , 2005 .

[3]  John R. Christy,et al.  UNCERTAINTIES IN CLIMATE TRENDS Lessons from Upper-Air Temperature Records , 2005 .

[4]  John Derber,et al.  The National Meteorological Center's spectral-statistical interpolation analysis system , 1992 .

[5]  Barry E. Schwartz,et al.  A Comparison of Temperature and Wind Measurements from ACARS-Equipped Aircraft and Rawinsondes , 1995 .

[6]  S. Warren,et al.  Temperature, Humidity, and Pressure Response of Radiosondes at Low Temperatures , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas Hauf,et al.  Aircraft type‐specific errors in AMDAR weather reports from commercial aircraft , 2008 .

[8]  R. Eskridge,et al.  Unexplained Discontinuity in the U.S. Radiosonde Temperature Data. Part II: Stratosphere , 2003 .

[9]  S. Benjamin,et al.  Accuracy of ACARS Wind and Temperature Observations Determined by Collocation , 1999 .

[10]  William R. Moninger,et al.  AUTOMATED METEOROLOGICAL REPORTS FROM COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT , 2003 .

[11]  S. Anderson,et al.  The relative utility of current observation systems to global‐scale NWP forecasts , 2000 .

[12]  James P. Nelson,et al.  A Case Study of the Sensitivity of the Eta Data Assimilation System , 2000 .

[13]  Taumi S. Daniels.  Tropospheric Airborne Meteorological Data Reporting (TAMDAR) Sensor Development , 2002 .

[14]  William G. Collins,et al.  Complex Quality Control of Significant Level Rawinsonde Temperatures , 1998 .

[15]  Unexplained Discontinuity in the U.S. Radiosonde Temperature Data. Part I: Troposphere , 2003 .

[16]  Fei Wu,et al.  Interannual variability of the tropical tropopause derived from radiosonde data and NCEP reanalyses , 2000 .

[17]  D. Gaffen,et al.  Temporal inhomogeneities in radiosonde temperature records , 1994 .

[18]  F. Schmidlin,et al.  Preliminary estimates of radiosonde thermistor errors , 1986 .

[19]  Von P. Walden,et al.  Radiosonde Temperature Measurements in Strong Inversions: Correction for Thermal Lag Based on an Experiment at the South Pole , 1997 .

[20]  John Derber,et al.  The Use of TOVS Cloud-Cleared Radiances in the NCEP SSI Analysis System , 1998 .

[21]  Dick Dee,et al.  Adaptive bias correction for satellite data in a numerical weather prediction system , 2007 .

[22]  Lars Isaksen,et al.  Use and impact of automated aircraft data in a global 4DVAR data assimilation system , 2003 .

[23]  Graeme Kelly,et al.  A satellite radiance‐bias correction scheme for data assimilation , 2001 .