The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.

Purpose This study evaluated whether certain spectral ripple conditions were more informative than others in predicting ecologically relevant unaided and aided speech outcomes. Method A quasi-experimental study design was used to evaluate 67 older adult hearing aid users with bilateral, symmetrical hearing loss. Speech perception in noise was tested under conditions of unaided and aided, auditory-only and auditory-visual, and 2 types of noise. Predictors included age, audiometric thresholds, audibility, hearing aid compression, and modulation depth detection thresholds for moving (4-Hz) or static (0-Hz) 2-cycle/octave spectral ripples applied to carriers of broadband noise or 2000-Hz low- or high-pass filtered noise. Results A principal component analysis of the modulation detection data found that broadband and low-pass static and moving ripple detection thresholds loaded onto the first factor whereas high-pass static and moving ripple detection thresholds loaded onto a second factor. A linear mixed model revealed that audibility and the first factor (reflecting broadband and low-pass static and moving ripples) were significantly associated with speech perception performance. Similar results were found for unaided and aided speech scores. The interactions between speech conditions were not significant, suggesting that the relationship between ripples and speech perception was consistent regardless of visual cues or noise condition. High-pass ripple sensitivity was not correlated with speech understanding. Conclusions The results suggest that, for hearing aid users, poor speech understanding in noise and sensitivity to both static and slow-moving ripples may reflect deficits in the same underlying auditory processing mechanism. Significant factor loadings involving ripple stimuli with low-frequency content may suggest an impaired ability to use temporal fine structure information in the stimulus waveform. Support is provided for the use of spectral ripple testing to predict speech perception outcomes in clinical settings.

[1]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  The role of spectro-temporal fine structure cues in lexical-tone discrimination for French and Mandarin listeners. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C W Turner,et al.  Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users , 2017, Hearing Research.

[4]  Stephan D Ewert,et al.  A two‐path model of auditory modulation detection using temporal fine structure and envelope cues , 2020, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  S. G. Nooteboom,et al.  Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices , 1982 .

[6]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[7]  D. Broadbent Listening to one of two synchronous messages. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Freyman,et al.  The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P F Seitz,et al.  The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M F Dorman,et al.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  High-rate envelope information in many channels provides resistance to reduction of speech intelligibility produced by multi-channel fast-acting compression. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. Lunner,et al.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids , 2016, Trends in hearing.

[15]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Powen Ru,et al.  Multiresolution spectrotemporal analysis of complex sounds. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  The minimum detectable duration of auditory signals for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Michael G. Heinz,et al.  Envelope Coding in Auditory Nerve Fibers Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[20]  B C Moore,et al.  Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[23]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Akeroyd Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[26]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J W Hall,et al.  Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Larry E. Humes,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Hearing Aid Outcome , 2003, Trends in amplification.

[29]  Brian French,et al.  Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[30]  J. Dubno,et al.  Speech recognition across the lifespan: Longitudinal changes from middle age to older adults. , 2015, American journal of audiology.

[31]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Karolina Smeds,et al.  Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[33]  Kristin J. Van Engen,et al.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Harriet A. Allen,et al.  The Association Between Cognitive Performance and Speech-in-Noise Perception for Adult Listeners: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, Trends in hearing.

[37]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners (L). , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  L. Feth,et al.  Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .

[40]  B. Moore,et al.  Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  S. Shamma,et al.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[43]  G E Loeb,et al.  Spatial cross-correlation , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[44]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Cochlear delays and traveling waves: comments on 'Experimental look at cochlear mechanics'. , 1994, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[45]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[46]  Rebecca L Warner Henning,et al.  The effects of hearing aid compression parameters on the short-term dynamic range of continuous speech. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[47]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  James M Kates,et al.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance , 2018, Ear and hearing.

[49]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[50]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[51]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility , 2003, Speech Commun..

[53]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  E W Yund,et al.  Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  L. Humes The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[56]  M R Leek,et al.  The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users , 2015, PloS one.

[58]  Kenneth S Henry,et al.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  Larry E Humes Age-Related Changes in Cognitive and Sensory Processing: Focus on Middle-Aged Adults. , 2015, American journal of audiology.

[60]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  Karen S Helfer,et al.  Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[62]  G F Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[65]  Stephanie Bor,et al.  Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[66]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms , 2003, Speech Commun..

[68]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception as a Talker-Contingent Process , 1993, Psychological science.

[69]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  Emily Buss,et al.  Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[72]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Frederick J Gallun,et al.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[75]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[76]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[77]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.