A Proposed Model for Evaluating the Sustainability of Continuous Change Programmes

Many studies report that it is difficult to sustain change. This article focuses on how an organization can initiate and sustain a continuous change process. A theoretical model is proposed as a fusion of two previous models for evaluating the sustainability of a change programme; the first is based on analysing stakeholder interest balance as a prerequisite for organizational sustainability, the second on analysing the design of the implementation, indicating whether long-term effects will be achieved. It is argued that the combination of these factors provides a more comprehensive perspective, since it allows us to evaluate both the ‘form’ and the ‘direction’ of the programme. To assess stakeholder interest balance, the goal for the change programme is analysed, utilizing the broad stakeholder interest balance perspective. To assess the design of the implementation, four preconditions for long-term effects should be analysed: management's ownership of the change initiative, professional steering, competent leadership and participation. Reference is given to the management concept Lean Production, which is claimed to engage the organization in continuous change. Application of the model highlights the mismatch between narrowly focused change programmes such as Lean Production and sustainable change.

[1]  G. Christiaens,et al.  Leading change , 2018, Leadership Transitions in Universities.

[2]  Azlan Amran,et al.  The Stakeholder Approach: A Sustainability Perspective , 2011 .

[3]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[4]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[5]  Aaron C. T. Smith,et al.  Duality Theory and Organizing Forms in Change Management , 2009 .

[6]  D. Buchanan,et al.  No Going Back: A Review of the Literature on Sustaining Organizational Change , 2005 .

[7]  Peter Docherty,et al.  What the world needs now is sustainable work systems , 2009 .

[8]  S. Hart,et al.  Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .

[10]  S. Benn,et al.  Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability , 2014 .

[11]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective , 2006 .

[12]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[13]  Per-Ola Börnfelt,et al.  Förändringskompetens på industrigolvet Kontinuerligt förändringsarbete i gränslandet mellan lean production och socioteknisk arbetsorganisation , 2006 .

[14]  Jostein Pettersen,et al.  Defining Lean Production : Some conceptual and practical issues , 2008 .

[15]  Cecilia Rapp Exploring the sustainability of improvement activities : the long-term development of a suggestion scheme , 2002 .

[16]  A. Griffiths,et al.  The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change , 2009 .

[17]  Inger G. Stensaker,et al.  Developing capacity for change , 2006 .

[18]  P. Hines,et al.  Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking , 2004 .

[19]  Katsuki Aoki,et al.  Transferring Japanese kaizen activities to overseas plants in China , 2008 .

[20]  Martin E. Smith,et al.  Success rates for different types of organizational change , 2002 .

[21]  H. Ibarra,et al.  How leaders create and use networks. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[22]  Bob Doppelt,et al.  Leading Change Toward Sustainability: A Change-Management Guide for Business, Government and Civil Society , 2003 .

[23]  Klaus J. Zink,et al.  Human Factors, Business Excellence and Corporate Sustainability: Differing Perspectives, Joint Objectives , 2008 .

[24]  Lennart Svensson,et al.  Hållbart arbetsliv - projekt som gästspel eller strategi i hållbar utveckling , 2007 .

[25]  N. Bateman Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement , 2005 .

[26]  Karen S. Whelan‐Berry,et al.  Linking Change Drivers and the Organizational Change Process: A Review and Synthesis , 2010 .

[27]  J. J. Dahlgaard,et al.  The state of ISO 9000 certification: a study of Swedish organizations , 2002 .

[28]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[29]  Suzanne Benn,et al.  Advancing Sustainability Through Change and Innovation: A Co-evolutionary Perspective , 2009 .

[30]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[31]  N. Bateman,et al.  Process improvement programmes: a model for assessing sustainability , 2002 .

[32]  John Drew,et al.  Journey to lean : making operational change stick , 2004 .

[33]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[34]  K. B. J. S. Eur HUMAN FACTORS IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT – XI , 2007 .

[35]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[36]  M. Starik,et al.  Weaving An Integrated Web: Multilevel and Multisystem Perspectives of Ecologically Sustainable Organizations , 1995 .

[37]  N. Nohria,et al.  Cracking the code of change. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[38]  Lena Abrahamsson,et al.  The good work--a Swedish trade union vision in the shadow of lean production. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[39]  B. Burnes Emergent change and planned change - Competitors or allies? The case of XYZ construction , 2004 .

[40]  D. Melé,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory , 2004 .

[41]  E. Lawler,et al.  Quality circles after the fad. , 1985, Harvard business review.

[42]  Ted Knodel Preparing the organizational ‘soil’ for measurable and sustainable change: business value management and project governance , 2004 .

[43]  S. Clegg,et al.  Business Ethics as Practice , 2007 .

[44]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Elisabeth Wilson-Evered,et al.  An investigation of champion-driven leadership processes , 2011 .

[46]  B. Burnes Reflections: Ethics and Organizational Change – Time for a Return to Lewinian Values , 2009 .

[47]  Jan Forslin,et al.  Seeking regenerative work in the post‐bureaucratic transition , 2008 .

[48]  C. Driscoll,et al.  The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[49]  P. Landsbergis,et al.  The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. , 1999, Journal of occupational health psychology.