Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP).

The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a component of the auditory event-related brain potential that occurs in response to infrequent changes in the physical properties of homogeneous series of sounds, even when subjects are instructed to ignore the auditory channel of stimulation. It has been proposed (e.g., Näätänen, 1990) that the MMN is generated by an automatic process in which a difference between the deviant sound and the previous, standard sound is detected by the brain. However, it is unclear how the form of memory involved is related to the rest of the memory system. The present study indicates that, for an MMN to be elicited in response to a change in tone frequency, the representation of the standard tone must be both (a) well-established as a standard in memory, and (b) in a currently active state. The relation between physiological and psychological aspects of memory representation is discussed.

[1]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? , 1992 .

[2]  W. P. Dixon,et al.  BMPD statistical software manual , 1988 .

[3]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  Short-term memory: Where do we stand? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[6]  W. Ritter,et al.  Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Hoffman,et al.  Memory and learning : the Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference , 1987 .

[8]  N. Cowan Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[10]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. , 1990 .

[12]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Human auditory primary and association cortex have differing lifetimes for activation traces , 1992, Brain Research.

[13]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[14]  R. Port Can complex temporal patterns be automatized? , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Attention and mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[16]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  STORAGE AND DECAY CHARACTERISTICS OF NONATTENDED AUDITORY STIMULI. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Properties of memory for unattended spoken syllables. , 1990 .

[19]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .

[21]  Raymond J. Bandlow Theories of Learning, 4th Edition. By Ernest R. Hilgard and Gordon H. Bower. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975 , 1976 .

[22]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Theories of Learning , 1981 .

[23]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Event-Related Potentials to Infrequent Changes in Synthesized Phonetic Stimuli , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  N. Cowan On short and long auditory stores. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials , 1987, Biological Psychology.

[28]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  R. Näätänen Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[30]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Converging evidence about information processing , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  H. Hayne,et al.  Reactivation of infant memory: implications for cognitive development. , 1987, Advances in child development and behavior.

[32]  Olli Aaltonen,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum , 1987, Biological Psychology.

[33]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[34]  M. Scherg,et al.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[36]  P. Ullsperger,et al.  Mismatch negativity in event-related potentials to auditory stimuli as a function of varying interstimulus interval. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[37]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[38]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Comparing Direct (Explicit) and Indirect (Implicit) Measures to Study Unconscious Memory , 1991 .

[39]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal how non-attended complex sound patterns are represented by the human brain , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[41]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  F. Attneave,et al.  The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory , 1949 .

[43]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch and processing negativities in auditory stimulus processing and selection , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  F. Perrin,et al.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[47]  M. Posner,et al.  Lexical access and the brain: anatomical constraints on cognitive models of word recognition. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[48]  W. F. Waters,et al.  Habituation of the orienting response: a gating mechanism subserving selective attention. , 1977, Psychophysiology.