Rapid recalibration based on optic flow in visually guided action

Action capabilities are always subject to limits. Whether on foot or in a vehicle, people can only move so fast, slow down so quickly, and turn so sharply. The successful performance of almost any perceptual-motor task requires actors to learn and continually relearn their ever-changing action capabilities. Such learning can be considered an example of perceptual-motor calibration. The present study includes two experiments designed to address basic questions about the nature of this calibration process. Subjects performed a simulated braking task, using a foot pedal to slow down to a stop in front of an obstacle in the path of motion. At one point in the experiment, the strength of the brake was increased or decreased unbeknownst to subjects, and behavior before and after the change in brake strength was analyzed for evidence of recalibration. Experiment 1 showed that actors rapidly recalibrate following a change in brake dynamics, even when they are unaware of the change. In Experiment 2, the scene turned black one second after braking was initiated. Subjects still recalibrated following the change in brake strength, suggesting that information in the sensory consequences of the initial brake adjustment is sufficient for recalibration, even in the absence of feedback about the outcome (i.e., in terms of final position error) of the task. Discussion focuses on the critical but often overlooked role of calibration in continuously controlled visually guided action, and the nature of the information used for recalibration.

[1]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Movement reversals in ball catching , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Brett R. Fajen The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking. , 2005 .

[3]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  M K Kaiser,et al.  How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. , 1995, Science.

[5]  M. Lenoir,et al.  Intercepting Moving Objects During Self-Motion. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Calibration, information, and control strategies for braking to avoid a collision. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Robert Gray,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000 .

[10]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  How Position, Velocity, and Temporal Information Combine in the Prospective Control of Catching: Data and Model , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Michaels,et al.  To Cross or Not to Cross: The Effect of Locomotion on Street-Crossing Behavior , 1996 .

[12]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[13]  G P Bingham,et al.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  P. McLeod,et al.  The generalized optic acceleration cancellation theory of catching. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D Regan,et al.  Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Rob Withagen,et al.  The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Initiation of evasive manoeuvres during self-motion: a test of three hypotheses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  B. Fajen Steering toward a goal by equalizing taus. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.

[21]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  P. R. Davidson,et al.  Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Hugo Bruggeman,et al.  Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Perceiving Possibilities for Action: On the Necessity of Calibration and Perceptual Learning for the Visual Guidance of Action , 2005, Perception.

[25]  Timothy A. Yates,et al.  A test of the tau-dot hypothesis of braking control in the real world. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Albert Postma,et al.  Effects of Hand Orientation and Delay on the Verbal Judgment of Haptically Perceived Orientation , 2005, Perception.

[27]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Laura F. Fox,et al.  Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  John P. Wann,et al.  Why you should look where you are going , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  The rate of adaptation to displacement prisms remains constant despite acquisition of rapid calibration , 1999 .

[31]  M T Turvey,et al.  Attunement, Calibration, and Exploration in Fast Haptic Perceptual Learning , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[33]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  John S. Thomsen Millikan's Lost Problem , 1968 .

[36]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[37]  J R Lackner,et al.  The role of reafference in recalibration of limb movement control and locomotion. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[38]  Seville Chapman Catching a Baseball , 1968 .

[39]  Adar Pelah,et al.  Visuomotor adaptation without vision? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Sensorimotor memory and grip force control: does grip force anticipate a self‐produced weight change when drinking with a straw from a cup? , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Visual illusion from running , 1996, Nature.

[43]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception I: operative optical variables, attunement, and calibration. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Rob Gray,et al.  Perceptual Processes Used by Drivers During Overtaking in a Driving Simulator , 2005, Hum. Factors.