Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusional Computed Tomography in Moderate Coronary Stenosis: Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Coronary computed tomography with myocardial perfusion imaging (CCTA-MPI) provides data on coronary anatomy and perfusion and may be useful in the assessment of ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD). Management of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions is challenging, and coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) evaluation is recommended to assess whether these lesions are functionally significant. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA-MPI in patients with stable CAD and at least 1 angiographically intermediate coronary lesion submitted to FFR. In this single-center prospective study, patients with stable CAD and at least 1 moderate coronary stenosis (50%–70% by visual estimation) were referred for CCTA-MPI (64-row multidetector) assessment before coronary FFR evaluation. Patients with severe coronary obstructions (≥70%) were excluded. The significance level adopted for all tests was 5%. Twenty-eight patients (mean age 60 ± SD years, 54% women) with 33 intermediate coronary obstructions were enrolled. Ten patients (30%) had functionally significant coronary obstructions characterized by FFR ≤0.8. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CCTA-MPI for the detection of functionally significant coronary obstructions were 30%, 100%, and 78.8%, respectively. CCTA-MPI positive predictive value was 100%, whereas negative predictive value was 76.7%. Correlation coefficient between tests was 0.48 (P = 0.005). On a novel approach to evaluate intermediate coronary lesions, accuracy of CCTA-MPI was 78.8%. The positive predictive value of an abnormal CCTA-MPI on this population was 100%, suggesting that CCTA-MPI may have a role in the assessment of patients with anatomically identified intermediate coronary lesions.

[1]  D. Andreini,et al.  Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  D. Andreini,et al.  Quantitative vs. qualitative evaluation of static stress computed tomography perfusion to detect haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease , 2018, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  A. Arai,et al.  Dynamic stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion for detecting myocardial ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[5]  A. Kono,et al.  Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  Young-Hak Kim,et al.  Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[7]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Michael Salerno,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study , 2015, European heart journal.

[10]  G. Sun,et al.  Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT, CT and MR compared to fractional flow reserve as reference standard. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  C. Becker,et al.  CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR , 2013, Heart.

[14]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[15]  Wei Guo,et al.  Aligning Coronary Anatomy and Myocardial Perfusion Territories: An Algorithm for the CORE320 Multicenter Study , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  M. Reiser,et al.  Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[18]  R. Cury,et al.  Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  H. Sipilä,et al.  Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation.

[20]  R. Cury,et al.  Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  R. Cury,et al.  Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. , 2010, Radiology.

[22]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Cury,et al.  Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[25]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. , 2006, European heart journal.

[27]  M. Reiser,et al.  Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[29]  B. Zaret,et al.  Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. , 2000, Circulation.

[30]  I. Meredith,et al.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. , 2012, European Heart Journal.