Simulation of Supersonic Nozzle Flows with Plasma-based Control

A phenomenological model is employed to mimic the control effects of eight Localized Arc Filament Plasma Actuators (LAFPA) placed around the periphery of a Mach 1.3 nozzle exit. In addition to the axisymmetric (m = 0) mode, the flapping or first mixed (m = ±1) and second mixed (m = ±2) modes are separately introduced at the preferred column-mode frequency corresponding to a Strouhal number of 0.33. No-control and constant excitation cases are also simulated. Comparison with preand post-computation experimental flow visualizations performed at the Ohio State University indicate that the simulations reproduce the main effects generated by the actuators. Detailed analysis with instantaneous, averaged and phase-averaged quantities suggests a complex coherent feature generation, evolution and dissipation process. For m = ±1, the phase-averaged flow reveals successive distorted elliptic vortex rings with axes in the flapping plane, but alternating on either side of the jet axis. This generates a chain of structures where each interacts with its predecessor on one side of the major plane and its successor on the other. Through self and mutual interaction, the leading segment of each loop is pinched and passes through the previous ring before rapidly breaking up, and the mean jet flow takes on an elliptic shape. The m = ±2 mode yields elliptic structures with major axes of successive rings being aligned with the two symmetry planes, which are orthogonal to each other. The minor axis side is pulled downstream faster than the rest of the structure under the possible influence of the higher velocity near the jet centerline and self-induced effects, yielding a horse-shoe shape when viewed in profile. The mean jet structure evolves from a “+” shaped cross-section to a square and then roughly circular profile as it dissipates. The m = 0 mode exhibits relatively stable roll-up events, with vortex ribs in the braid regions connecting successive large coherent structures. The constant excitation and no-control cases are similar to each other. In terms of mixing, of the modes examined, them = ±1mode is confirmed to show the most rapid decline of centerline Mach number, followed by them = ±2 mode.

[1]  Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.  Artificial Dissipation Models for the Euler Equations , 1985 .

[2]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  SUPERSONIC JET NOISE , 1995 .

[3]  R. Pletcher,et al.  Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. By D. A ANDERSON, J. C. TANNEHILL and R. H. PLETCHER. Hemisphere, 1984. 599 pp. $39.95. , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  LES investigation of a Mach 1.3 jet With and without plasma actuators , 2009 .

[5]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Mixing Enhancement in Supersonic Free Shear Flows , 1995 .

[6]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Far-Field Acoustic Investigation into Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms and Trends , 2005 .

[7]  Datta Gaitonde,et al.  High-order accurate methods for unsteady vortical flows on curvilinear meshes , 1998 .

[8]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[9]  Meng Wang,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTION OF FLOW-GENERATED SOUND , 2006 .

[10]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[11]  G. Haller An objective definition of a vortex , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  James I. Hileman,et al.  Development and characterization of plasma actuators for high-speed jet control , 2004 .

[14]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  Elliptic jets. Part 3. Dynamics of preferred mode coherent structure , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Israel J Wygnanski,et al.  The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. I - The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzle. II - The flow resulting from the interaction between two waves , 1987 .

[16]  Israel J Wygnanski,et al.  The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 2. The flow resulting from the interaction between two waves , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Mark F. Reeder,et al.  Control of an axisymmetric jet using vortex generators , 1994 .

[18]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Further development of a Navier-Stokes solution procedure based on higher-order formulas , 1999 .

[19]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Large-eddy simulation for acoustics , 2007 .

[20]  T. C. Corke,et al.  Resonance in axisymmetric jets with controlled helical-mode input , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .

[22]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Preferred modes and the spreading rates of jets , 1983 .

[23]  Fernando F. Grinstein,et al.  Self-induced vortex ring dynamics in subsonic rectangular jets , 1995 .

[24]  Marcel Vinokur,et al.  Conservation equations of gasdynamics in curvilinear coordinate systems , 1974 .

[25]  J. Steger Implicit Finite-Difference Simulation of Flow about Arbitrary Two-Dimensional Geometries , 1978 .

[26]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Flow control with noncircular jets , 1999 .

[27]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Streamwise and spanwise vortex interaction in an axisymmetric jet. A computational and experimental study , 1996 .

[28]  T. Pulliam,et al.  A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm , 1981 .

[29]  J. Morrison,et al.  Flux-difference split scheme for turbulent transport equations , 1990 .

[30]  Mo Samimy,et al.  Active Control of a High Reynolds Number Mach 0.9 Axisymmetric Jet , 2009 .

[31]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Numerical simulation of a Mach 1.92 turbulent jet and its sound field , 2000 .

[32]  F. Hussain,et al.  Elliptic jets. Part 1. Characteristics of unexcited and excited jets , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  E. Gutmark,et al.  Wave structures in jets of arbitrary shape. III. Triangular jets , 1988 .

[34]  D. Bodony,et al.  A high-order, overset-mesh algorithm for adjoint-based optimization for aeroacoustics control , 2010 .

[35]  Numerical modeling of plasma actuators in high speed jets , 2009 .

[36]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Computation of a high Reynolds number jet and its radiated noise using large eddy simulation based on explicit filtering , 2006 .

[37]  D. Gaitonde,et al.  Effect of Thermally-Induced Surface Perturbation in Compressible Flow , 2009 .

[38]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Perturbed Free Shear Layers , 1984 .

[39]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Near field dynamics of subsonic free square jets. A computational and experimental study , 1995 .

[40]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  Elliptic jets. Part 2. Dynamics of coherent structures: pairing , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[41]  Mark F. Reeder,et al.  Effect of tabs on the flow and noise field of an axisymmetric jet , 1993 .

[42]  R. F. Warming,et al.  An Implicit Factored Scheme for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1977 .

[43]  Mo Samimy,et al.  Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuators , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[44]  Mo Samimy,et al.  Active control of a Mach 0.9 jet for noise mitigation using plasma actuators , 2007 .