Neutronic study of a new generation of the small modular pressurized water reactor using Monte-Carlo simulation

Abstract Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are the innovative design of nuclear reactors making remarkable interest during recent years. Since there is not enough available operating experience on SMRs, it might be possible to initiate extensive investigations on these types of reactors for the purpose of improving the current performance level of these systems, significantly. The main purpose of this present study is neutronic study of a typical small modular pressurized water reactor via Monte-Carlo method using the MCNPX code. The CAREM25 is chosen as the reference SMR. The reactor core geometry is simulated and neutronic parameters are visualized and analyzed via high qualified 3-D figures. They are figure out neutronic nature of the chosen case study. They capture the simulation of the reactor core geometry, and skim the neutron flux and power distribution, radial and axial power peaking factors and the influence of the control rods on the thermal flux. Central fuel assembly is determined as the hottest fuel assembly with power peaking factor of 1.778. The hottest fuel rod power peaking factor is calculated as 1.846 in the hottest assembly. The maximum calculated axial power peaking factor of the hot rod is 2.85. Results show that the maximum axial power along the fuel rods occurred below the mid-plane of the rod. The ratio of the hot to average rod axial power peaking factor as a safety parameter used to calculate the maximum heat flux in the hottest channel, is calculated close to 2 in almost 70% of the core height. The core reactivity at cold and hot shut down without safety injections of boron acid is calculated as 0 . 09712 ( Δ k k ) and − 0 . 00103 ( Δ k k ) , respectively. Results show suitable neutronic behavior and responses during virtual tests and analyses.

[1]  Moon Hee Chang,et al.  SMART behavior under over-pressurizing accident conditions , 2000 .

[2]  Sümer Şahin,et al.  Criticality and burn up evolutions of the Fixed Bed Nuclear Reactor with alternative fuels , 2010 .

[3]  Feodor M. Mitenkov,et al.  Small nuclear heat and power co-generation stations and water desalination complexes on the basis of marine reactor plants , 1997 .

[4]  The comparison of MCNP perturbation technique with MCNP difference method in critical calculation , 2010 .

[5]  Bojan Petrovic,et al.  Core physics analysis of 100% MOX Core in IRIS , 2008 .

[6]  Koroush Shirvan,et al.  The design of a compact integral medium size PWR : the CIRIS , 2012 .

[7]  A. Borio di Tigliole,et al.  Benchmark evaluation of reactor critical parameters and neutron fluxes distributions at zero power for the TRIGA Mark II reactor of the University of Pavia using the Monte Carlo code MCNP , 2010 .

[8]  B. Verboomen,et al.  Monte Carlo Calculation of the Effective Neutron Generation Time , 2006 .

[9]  Kazuhiko Kunitomi,et al.  Study of a nuclear energy supplied steelmaking system for near-term application , 2012 .

[10]  Jasmina L. Vujic,et al.  Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper? , 2012 .

[11]  Young-Jong Chung,et al.  Passive cooldown performance of a 65 MW integral reactor , 2008 .

[12]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Economic features of integral, modular, small-to-medium size reactors , 2010 .

[13]  Zhitao Liu,et al.  Technology readiness assessment of Small Modular Reactor (SMR) designs , 2014 .

[14]  Ser Gi Hong,et al.  A preliminary simulation study of dynamic rod worth for the SMART (System-integrated Modular Advanced ReacTor) reactor , 2013 .

[15]  Young-Jong Chung,et al.  Thermal hydraulic analysis of SMART for heat removal transients by a secondary system , 2003 .

[16]  Takashi Kanagawa,et al.  Integrated modular water reactor (IMR) design , 2004 .

[17]  Young-Jong Chung,et al.  Numerical study on thermo-hydrodynamics in the reactor internals of SMART , 2011 .

[18]  Río Negro,et al.  CAREM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES , 2005 .

[19]  M Dowdall,et al.  Floating nuclear power plants: potential implications for radioactive pollution of the northern marine environment. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[20]  Sümer Şahin,et al.  Criticality investigations for the fixed bed nuclear reactor using thorium fuel mixed with plutonium or minor actinides , 2009 .

[21]  Mamoru Konomura,et al.  A Case for Small Modular Fast Reactor , 2007 .

[22]  Daniel T Ingersoll,et al.  Deliberately Small Reactors and the Second Nuclear Era , 2009 .

[23]  Farhang Sefidvash.  Status of the small modular fluidized bed light water nuclear reactor concept , 1996 .

[24]  J. F. Briesmeister.  MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[25]  Mahmut Alkan,et al.  Burnup extension of the Fixed Bed Nuclear Reactor using alternative fuels , 2013 .

[26]  Y. Mahlers.  VVER-1000 neutronics calculation with ENDF/B-VII data , 2009 .

[27]  D. F. Delmastro,et al.  CAREM Project Status , 2011 .