Pigeons were exposed to four cycles per session of a multiple schedule in which each cycle involved twelve 60-sec fixed intervals followed by four 180-sec intervals [(12 FI 60-sec)(4 FI 180-sec) schedule]. Post-reinforcement pauses were shorter during the first few short intervals of each cycle than during later short intervals, and increased over the four long intervals of each cycle (positive and negative transient contrast). A (12 FI 15-sec)(4 FI 45-sec) schedule showed similar results. These two schedules differed in some other respects indicating effects of absolute FI duration on stimulus control. Differences in contrast properties between both these procedures and multiple variable-interval schedules were related to the pause-producing property of reinforcement on FI (temporal inhibition). Behavior under two other multiple fixed-interval schedules-(2 FI 360-sec)(1 FI 720-sec) and (3 FI 360-sec)(1 FI 720-sec)-differed in certain respects from both the (12 FI x-sec)(4 FI 3x-sec) schedules. These differences may be related to differences in the number of successive fixed intervals within a component (run length).
[1]
J. Staddon,et al.
SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS.
,
1965,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[2]
J A Nevin,et al.
An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.
,
1966,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[3]
D. R. Williams,et al.
Time-dependent contrast effects in a multiple schedule of food reinforcement.
,
1967,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4]
A. Charles Catania,et al.
Inhibition and behavioral contrast
,
1964
.
[5]
J. Staddon,et al.
Attention and temporal discrimination: factors controlling responding under a cyclic-interval schedule.
,
1967,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6]
David R. Williams.
Negative induction in instrumental behavior reinforced by central stimulation
,
1965
.