A Simple Two-Component Model of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in the Human Cochlea

Neural response telemetry (NRT) permits in situ intracochlear recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential from the auditory nerves using scala tympani electrodes. The recorded NRT waveforms can generally be categorized under either single positive peak or double positive peak waveforms. This is similar to the observations from Stypulkowski and van den Honert, who suggested that the double peak complex arises from two components that could be axonal and dendritic in origin, respectively. Using a simple mathematical model which linearly combines two separate waveforms similar in shape but differing in amplitude and latencies, it was possible to simulate the various NRT waveform categories. The simulation results support the view that the two waveform components originate from dendritic or axonal processes and implies that the shape of the response waveform may provide information about the degree of neural survival in the stimulated cochlea. This information could be useful for determining optimal speech coding parameters for cochlear implant users on an individual basis.

[1]  M. Killian Excitability of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1994 .

[2]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[3]  K. Plant,et al.  Speech Perception as a Function of Electrical Stimulation Rate: Using the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[4]  M W Skinner,et al.  Identification of Speech by Cochlear Implant Recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) Speech Coding Strategies I. Vowels , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Characterization of wave I of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig , 1993, Hearing Research.

[6]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M W Skinner,et al.  Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants. , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[8]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[9]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus). , 1996, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[10]  Kevin H. Franck,et al.  The electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential: fitting applications for cochlear implant users , 1999 .

[11]  J. Nadol Degeneration of cochlear neurons as seen in the spiral ganglion of man , 1990, Hearing Research.

[12]  M. Goycoolea,et al.  Ultrastructural studies of the peripheral extensions (dendrites) of type i ganglion cells in the cat , 1990, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  A. Pollak,et al.  Histopathological features of the spiral ganglion and cochlear nerve in temporal bones from three patients with profound hearing loss. , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[15]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[16]  J M Aran,et al.  Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  H J McDermott,et al.  Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[18]  J K Shallop,et al.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[19]  J K Shallop,et al.  Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[20]  D T Lawson,et al.  Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.