Investigating the Relative Importance of Design Criteria in the Evaluation of the Usability of Educational Websites from the Viewpoint of Students

The importance of considering usability in the design and development of educational websites is well recognised. However, there is a lack of research which has exposed the design features students prefer on an educational website. This research developed specific criteria for evaluating the usability of educational websites consisting of 25 design issues distributed into five major categories: navigation, organisation / architecture, ease of use and communications, design, and content. Then the relative importance of the categories and subcategories of the developed criteria in the evaluation of the usability of educational websites was investigated from the viewpoint of 237 students. A further step was taken to determine if the relative importance differed based on the gender and major / specialisation of the students involved in the research (where students were selected from two faculties: Information Technology and Administration). The results showed that the order of the criteria from the most to the least important in the evaluation of the usability of educational websites from the viewpoint of students was: content, navigation, ease of use and communications, design, and organisation / architecture. The results also showed that there was a statistically significant difference between males and females regarding only one category: the content. Females considered it as the most important category while males considered it as the second most important category. However, the results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the students of the two selected faculties regarding the relative importance of the criteria.

[1]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two-factor model for website design and evaluation , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[3]  Ann M. Pearson,et al.  Determining the importance of key criteria in web usability , 2007 .

[4]  Toni Granollers,et al.  Testing Website Usability in Spanish-Speaking Academia through Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthroughs , 2008, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Anju Vyas Print , 2003 .

[6]  Sean Larrangton-White Midm Designing Web Usability: The practice of simplicity , 2001 .

[7]  Nektarios Kostaras,et al.  Assessing Educational Web-site Usability using Heuristic Evaluation Rules , 2007 .

[8]  Michalis Xenos,et al.  Quality Evaluation of Educational Websites Using Heuristic and Laboratory Methods , 2008 .

[9]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Analyzing the influence of website design parameters on website usability , 2005 .

[11]  Michael du Toit,et al.  Evaluating the usability of an academic marketing department's website from a marketing student's perspective , 2009 .

[12]  Suleiman H. Mustafa,et al.  Usability of the Academic Websites of Jordan ' s Universities An Evaluation Study , 2008 .

[13]  Ping Zhang,et al.  A Comparison of the Most Important Website Features in Different Domains: An Empirical Study of User Perceptions , 2000 .