Effects of field of view on balance in an immersive environment

With technological progress, wide field-of-view (FOV) displays will become increasingly common. Wide FOVs provide a more immersive environment and produce stronger self-motion perception. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between FOV and scene content on postural stability in an immersive environment. 10 subjects were tested using two different scenes (a simple radial pattern and a "meaningful" city scene) at six FOVs (30/spl deg/, 60/spl deg/, 90/spl deg/, 120/spl deg/, 150/spl deg/ 180/spl deg/) using a within-subjects design. Subjects exhibited more postural disturbance with increasing FOV. A surprisingly large increase in disturbance was found for the interval between 150/spl deg/ and 180/spl deg/ using the city scene. No statistically significant difference was found for effects of scene content. Two groups (postural stable group and postural unstable group) were identified during experiment. These groups performed differently in the two scene conditions. Future research plans are described.

[1]  K. Hamilton,et al.  Limitations of postural equilibrium tests for examining simulator sickness. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Postural instability induced by virtual reality exposure: Development of a certification protocol , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  J H Mackintosh,et al.  The effect of altitude on tests of reaction time and alertness. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  C. L. Thornton,et al.  Cue conflict related to perceptual style. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  S. Cobb,et al.  Static posture tests for the assessment of postural instability after virtual environment use , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Perception & control of self-motion , 1991 .

[7]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[8]  David A. Southard,et al.  Head-mounted displays for virtual reality , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[9]  Robert V. Kenyon,et al.  The effects of field of view size on the control of roll motion , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  T. Heckmann,et al.  Circular Vection as a Function of the Relative Sizes, Distances, and Positions of Two Competing Visual Displays , 1989, Perception.

[11]  James R. Lackner,et al.  Circumventing Side Effects of Immersive Virtual Environments , 1997, HCI.

[12]  R. Kenyon,et al.  The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. , 2000, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[13]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation , 1975, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Beck.  Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[15]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Hulk,et al.  Vertical Optokinetic Sensations by Limited Stimulation of the Peripheral Field of Vision , 1983 .

[17]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[18]  R. B. Post,et al.  The two modes of processing concept and some implications In J , 1982 .

[19]  Théophile Ohlmann,et al.  Selection of spatial frame of reference and postural control variability , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  G. C. Quarton,et al.  The Neurosciences;: Second study program , 1970 .

[21]  R S Kennedy,et al.  Simulator sickness in U.S. Navy flight simulators. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.